Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "trauma"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Impacts of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Outbreaks in Korea: Level 1 Trauma Center Data of Domestic Incidents and Intentional Injury
Ye Rim Chang, Kyoung Min Kim, Hyo Joung Kim, Dong Hun Kim, Jeonsang Kim, Dongsub Noh, Dae Sung Ma, Jeongseok Yun, Jung-Ho Yun, Seok Won Lee, Seok Ho Choi, Yoonjung Heo, Sung Wook Chang
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020;11(6):345-350.   Published online December 22, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.6.02
  • 6,559 View
  • 164 Download
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

As a protective measure to slow down the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 in Korea, social distancing was implemented from February 29th, 2020. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of domestic incidents and intentional injury during March 2020 when social distancing was in effect.

Methods

There were 12,638 patients who visited the Level 1 trauma center of Chungnam province with injuries from domestic incidents, familial discord, and intentional injury. The prevalence of injuries during March 2020 was compared with the average of the previous 5 years, and the average for every March between 2015 and 2019.

Results

The prevalence of domestic incidents in March 2020 was significantly higher than the 5-year average, and the average for every March from 2015 to 2019 (p < 0.001). Familial discord (p = 0.002) and intentional injury (p = 0.031) were more frequently observed in March 2020. Adolescents showed a markedly higher level of intentional injury in March 2020 than in both the 5-year average (p = 0.031), and average for every March over the previous 5 years (p = 0.037).

Conclusion

The prevalence of domestic incidents and intentional injury were significantly higher during the period of social distancing in Korea. There is a need for social consensus, better policies, and psychological support services, especially if faced with a second or third wave of coronavirus disease.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adolescent Self-Harm: Based on a National Emergency Department Information System
    Ju-Hyeon Park, Young-Woo Seo, Seungbum Chae
    International Journal of Environmental Research an.2023; 20(5): 4666.     CrossRef
  • Changes in Injury Pattern and Outcomes of Trauma Patients after COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Myungjin Jang, Mina Lee, Giljae Lee, Jungnam Lee, Kangkook Choi, Byungchul Yu
    Healthcare.2023; 11(8): 1074.     CrossRef
  • Intimate Partner Violence in the Orthopaedic Patient Population
    Jennifer A. Kunes, Marisa N. Ulrich, Charlotte E. Orr, Lisa K. Cannada, Christen M. Russo
    JBJS Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Characteristics of Attempted and Completed Suicides During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Nathan Flesher, Marisa-Nicole Zayat, Elizabeth Ablah, Hayrettin Okut, Kelly Lightwine, James M. Haan
    The American Surgeon™.2023; : 000313482311739.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Clinical Characteristics of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients According to the Mechanism Before and After COVID-19
    Jonghyun Sung, Jongwook Choi, Kum Whang, Sung Min Cho, Jongyeon Kim, Seung Jin Lee, Yeon gyu Jang
    Korean Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 19(3): 307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic at a major Danish trauma center in 2020 compared with 2018–2019: A retrospective cohort study
    Frederik Trier, Jesper Fjølner, Nikolaj Raaber, Anders H. Sørensen, Hans Kirkegaard
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.2022; 66(2): 265.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on trauma team activations in a single major Lithuanian trauma center: A retrospective single-center study
    Vytautas Aukstakalnis, Kristina Blaziene, Juozas Cepla, Greta Vileitaite, Kestutis Stasaitis, Dinas Vaitkaitis
    International Journal of Critical Illness and Inju.2022; 12(1): 17.     CrossRef
  • Transmission parameters of coronavirus disease 2019 in South Asian countries
    Mridul Sannyal, Abul Mukid Md. Mukaddes
    Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives.2022; 13(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentations to health services following self-harm: systematic review
    Sarah Steeg, Ann John, David J. Gunnell, Nav Kapur, Dana Dekel, Lena Schmidt, Duleeka Knipe, Ella Arensman, Keith Hawton, Julian P. T. Higgins, Emily Eyles, Catherine Macleod-Hall, Luke A. McGuiness, Roger T. Webb
    The British Journal of Psychiatry.2022; 221(4): 603.     CrossRef
Perceived Psychological Traumatic Childbirth in Iranian Mothers: Diagnostic Value of Coping Strategies
Sedigheh Abdollahpour, Seyed Abbas Mousavi, Habibollah Esmaily, Ahmad Khosrav
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2019;10(2):72-77.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.2.05
  • 21,689 View
  • 41 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of a stress coping scale for predicting perceived psychological traumatic childbirth in mothers.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed on 400 new mothers (within 48 hours of childbirth). Psychological traumatic childbirth was evaluated using the 4 diagnostic criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Coping was measured using Moss and Billings’ Stress Coping Strategies Scale.

Results

The overall mean score of stress coping was 29 ± 14.2. There were 193 (43.8%) mothers that had experienced a psychological traumatic childbirth. A stress coping score ≤ 30, with a sensitivity of 90.16 (95% CI = 85.1–94.0), and a specificity of 87.44 (95% CI = 82.1–91.6), was determined as a predictor of psychological traumatic childbirth. So that among mothers with stress coping scores ≤ 30, 87% had experienced a psychological traumatic childbirth.

Conclusion

Investigating the degree of coping with stress can be used as an accurate diagnostic tool for psychological traumatic childbirth. It is recommended that during pregnancy, problem-solving and stress management training programs be used as psychological interventions for mothers with low levels of stress control. This will ensure that they can better cope with traumatic childbirth and post-traumatic stress in the postpartum stage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Relationship between Experience of Antepartum Intervention and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Following Childbirth: A Prospective Study
    Sedigheh Abdollahpour, Mona Larki, Najme Rajabi, Elham Azmoude
    Current Women s Health Reviews.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of traumatic childbirth perception scale in Chinese women
    Caifeng Chen, Xiaoying Wang, Han Xu, Xuejie Liu, Yuhong Li
    Current Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Labor Dance on Traumatic Childbirth Perception and Comfort: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Bihter Akin, Hülya Yurteri Türkmen, Hacer Yalnız Dilcen, Ebru Sert
    Clinical Nursing Research.2022; 31(5): 909.     CrossRef
  • The relationship of psychosocial well‐being and social support with pregnant women's perceptions of traumatic childbirth
    Hacer Yalnız Dilcen, Filiz Aslantekin, Naciye Aktaş
    Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.2021; 35(2): 650.     CrossRef

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives