Figure 1Dengue cases reported in the Cuddalore district by month for the years 2012 and 2013.
Figure 2Diagnostic tools used to confirm dengue cases in the Cuddalore district in 2013. ELISA = enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Ig = immunoglobulin; NS1 = nonstructural Protein 1; RDT = rapid diagnostic test.
Figure 3The House Index status in some outbreak villages in the Cuddalore district before and after an outbreak.
Figure 4The time taken in days to halt the dengue outbreaks in the Cuddalore district.
Figure 5The declining trend of larval indices from the day of intervention to the halting of the dengue outbreak in Sevabharathi of the Nagapattinam district.
Figure 6The declining trend of larval indices from the day of intervention to the halting of the dengue outbreak in New Nambiyar Nagar of the Nagapattinam district.
Figure 7The declining trend of larval indices from the day of intervention to the halting of the dengue outbreak in Old Nambiyar Nagar of the Nagapattinam district.
Figure 8The declining trend of larval indices from the day of intervention to the halting of the dengue outbreak in Tatanagar of the Nagapattinam district.
Figure 9The diagnostic tools used to predict dengue cases in rural and urban areas of the Nagapattinam district. ELISA = enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Ig = immunoglobulin; NS1 = nonstructural Protein 1; RDT = rapid diagnostic test.
Figure 10The declining trend of House Index, Container Index, and Breteau Index during the dengue outbreak in the Mukkudal primary health center of the Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu, India.
Table 1The number of dengue cases reported in the Cuddalore district by month in 2012 and 2013.
|
Month |
2012 |
2013 |
1 |
Jan |
3 |
273 |
2 |
Feb |
3 |
100 |
3 |
Mar |
6 |
44 |
4 |
Apr |
1 |
32 |
5 |
May |
0 |
19 |
6 |
Jun |
4 |
7 |
7 |
Jul |
8 |
19 |
8 |
Aug |
17 |
14 |
9 |
Sep |
19 |
26 |
10 |
Oct |
142 |
117 |
11 |
Nov |
563 |
99 |
12 |
Dec |
734 |
77 |
|
Total
|
1500
|
827
|
Table 2The number of positive cases and the various diagnostic tools used to predict them.
Diagnostic tools |
No. of cases |
NS1 ELISA |
1179 |
IgM ELISA |
211 |
RDT NS1 |
100 |
RDT NS1 |
10 |
Total |
1500 |
Table 3
Aedes larval density monitoring in primary health centers (PHCs) and the Cuddalore Municipality during the dengue outbreak in the Cuddalore district in 2013.
|
Name of the block |
Name of the PHC |
Name of the village |
Period of the fever outbreak |
No. of dengue positives |
Initial House Index (HI) |
Container Index (CI) |
Breteau Index (BI) if applicable as 100 houses searched |
HI |
CI |
BI |
Time taken to halt the outbreak in d |
1 |
Annagiramam |
Melpattampakkam |
Keezharungunam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
5
|
8
|
1.6 |
10
|
2.1
|
0.49
|
2.82
|
13
|
2 |
Cuddalore |
Naduveerapattu |
Nariankuppam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
1
|
6
|
1.2 |
8
|
1.8
|
0.5
|
1.8
|
12
|
3 |
Cuddalore |
Karaikadu |
Manakuppam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
1
|
15.6
|
3.12 |
17.6
|
1.6
|
0.7
|
1.6
|
11
|
4 |
Cuddalore |
Karaikadu |
Sangolikuppam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2
|
8.2
|
1.64 |
10.2
|
1.7
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
14
|
5 |
Cuddalore |
Madalapattu |
Periyakattupalayam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
20 |
4 |
22 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
15 |
6 |
Cuddalore |
Madalapattu |
Tazhanguda |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
13.2 |
2.64 |
15.2 |
1.9 |
0.8 |
1.9 |
14 |
7 |
Cuddalore |
Vellakarai |
Vellakarai |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
8 |
14.8 |
2.8 |
16.8 |
2.9 |
1.3 |
3.9 |
10 |
8 |
Panruti |
Kadampuliyur |
Malingampattu |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
5 |
40 |
5.88 |
42 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
1.8 |
15 |
9 |
Panruti |
Kadampuliyur |
South Melmampattu |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
4 |
28.2 |
3.81 |
30.2 |
3.2 |
1.1 |
3.2 |
13 |
10 |
Vadalur |
Venpettai |
Vadakutthu |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
16 |
3.03 |
18 |
3.3 |
1.5 |
3.3 |
16 |
11 |
Parangipettai |
Gavarapattu |
Kovilampoondi |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
5 |
8.8 |
1.62 |
10.8 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
2.5 |
12 |
12 |
Parangipettai |
Killai |
Ponnanthittu |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
4 |
6.6 |
1.25 |
8.6 |
2.3 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
14 |
13 |
Parangipettai |
Gavarapattu |
Gavarapattu |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
10 |
1.8 |
12 |
3.2 |
1.13 |
3.2 |
13 |
14 |
Parangipettai |
Ayyepuram |
Ayyepuram |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
7.2 |
1.4 |
9.2 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
2.7 |
11 |
15 |
Kammapuram |
Arasakuzhi |
Arasakuzhi |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
22 |
3.7 |
24 |
3.8 |
1.1 |
6.4 |
14 |
16 |
Kammapuram |
Kammapuram |
Kammapuram |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
1 |
22 |
0.44 |
4.2 |
2 |
0.19 |
2 |
13 |
17 |
Kammapuram |
Arasakuzhi |
Gangaikondan |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
13.2 |
0.54 |
15.2 |
1.5 |
0.28 |
1.5 |
12 |
18 |
Kammapuram |
Palakollai |
Palakollai |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
40.1 |
7.7 |
42.1 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
2.3 |
14 |
19 |
Mangalampettai |
Mangalampettai |
Mangalampettai |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
1 |
21 |
0.68 |
4.1 |
1.7 |
0.32 |
1.7 |
12 |
20 |
Nallur |
Veppur |
Veppur |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
13.7 |
3.03 |
15.7 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
11 |
21 |
Nallur |
Nallur |
Nallur |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
15 |
3.31 |
17 |
1.7 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
13 |
22 |
Nallur |
Sirumangalam |
Elangaiyanur |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
8 |
1.94 |
10 |
1.8 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
11 |
23 |
Mangalur |
Thozhudur |
Thozhudur |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
8 |
14.4 |
2.45 |
16.4 |
4.2 |
0.8 |
4.2 |
14 |
24 |
Mangalur |
Sirupakkam |
Sirupakkam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
1 |
7.2 |
1.51 |
9.2 |
1 |
0.5 |
1 |
12 |
25 |
Mangalur |
E.keeranur |
Vasistapuram |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
5 |
12.6 |
2.99 |
14.6 |
1 |
0.4 |
1 |
10 |
26 |
Cuddalore mty |
Devanampattinam |
Devanampattinam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
6 |
13.9 |
2.56 |
15.9 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
2.6 |
18 |
27 |
Cuddalore mty |
Pudupalayam |
Pudupalayam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
7.6 |
1.4 |
9.6 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
12 |
28 |
Cuddalore mty |
Tsunami nagar |
Tsunami nagar |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
22 |
1.9 |
24 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
2.6 |
15 |
29 |
Cuddalore mty |
Annanagar |
Annanagar |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
2 |
8.5 |
2.1 |
10.5 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
14 |
30 |
Nellikuppam |
Vanpakkam |
Vanpakkam |
01 Aug 2013 to 31 Dec 2013 |
3 |
8.5 |
1.63 |
10.5 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
16 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15.27
|
2.45
|
16.37
|
2.2
|
1.77
|
2.4
|
13.13
|
Table 4The habitats of Aedes species in some rural and urban areas of the Cuddalore district that exhibited dengue positives and permissible Aedes indices.
|
Name of the block |
Name of the villages that took > 15 d to stop dengue |
No. of cases reported from NS1 tool |
Occult habitats of dengue & its index |
NS1 |
IgM |
Total |
1 |
Annagiramam |
|
|
|
25 |
8 |
33 |
2 |
Cuddalore |
Kondur |
10 |
Refrigerator |
180 |
19 |
199 |
|
|
Koothapakkam |
7 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Pathirikuppam |
8 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Thiruvandipuram |
7 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Knpettai |
9 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Tazhanguda |
9 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Ramapuram |
12 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
3 |
Panruti |
Silambinathanpettai |
23 |
Refrigerator |
103 |
15 |
118 |
|
|
|
|
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
4 |
Vadalur |
Kurinjipadi |
14 |
Refrigerator |
112 |
23 |
135 |
5 |
Parangipettai |
|
|
|
38 |
6 |
44 |
|
|
Killai |
4 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Parangipettai |
6 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
6 |
Kammapuram |
Seplanatham |
6 |
Refrigerator |
35 |
9 |
44 |
|
|
Nadiyapattu |
5 |
Poclain tyres |
|
|
|
7 |
Kumaratchi |
Annamalainagar |
5 |
Refrigerator |
17 |
9 |
23 |
8 |
Nallur |
Veppur |
5 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Pennadam |
4 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
9 |
Virudhachalam |
|
|
|
28 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
Thottikuppam |
3 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
10 |
Mangalur |
|
|
|
15 |
4 |
19 |
|
|
Alathur |
6 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
11 |
Cuddalore urban |
|
|
|
209 |
31 |
|
|
|
Devanampattinam |
27 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Yandipalayam |
16 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Semmandalam |
10 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Manjakuppam |
19 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Kammiyampettai |
9 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Thirupathiripuliyur |
17 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Pudupalayam |
10 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
12 |
Nellikuppam urban |
|
|
|
54 |
19 |
73 |
|
|
Nellikuppam |
7 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Thirukandeeswaram |
13 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Vazhapattu |
7 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeevanagar |
5 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
13 |
Chidambaram urban |
Chidambaram |
26 |
Refrigerator |
26 |
6 |
32 |
14 |
Panruti urban |
Panruti |
19 |
Refrigerator |
26 |
0 |
26 |
|
|
Thiruvadhigai |
4 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
|
|
Andipalayam |
3 |
Refrigerator |
|
|
|
15 |
Virudhachalam urban |
Virudhachalam |
33 |
Refrigerator |
33 |
2 |
35 |
16 |
Neyveli township |
Neyveli |
8 |
Tree holes |
8 |
0 |
8 |
Table 5Basic data describing the dengue situation in the Nagapattinam district in 2013.
|
Month |
No. of dengue cases in urban areas |
No. of dengue cases in Keechankuppam |
Other villages |
Total |
1 |
August |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
September |
190 |
41 |
81 |
312 |
3 |
October |
98 |
26 |
110 |
234 |
|
Total |
298 |
67 |
191 |
556 |
Table 6The number of dengue cases reported in rural and urban areas of the Nagapattinam district and the various diagnostic tools used to confirm them.
Location |
Diagnostic tools
|
Total |
NS1 RDT |
NS1 ELISA |
IgM RDT |
IgM ELISA |
IgG RDT |
IgG ELISA |
Rural |
235 |
6 |
9 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
258 |
Urban |
262 |
5 |
27 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
298 |
|
Total |
556 |
Table 7The declining trends of the House Index (HI) and Container Index (CI) from the intervention days to the halt of the dengue outbreaks in the urban areas of Sevabharathi, Old and New Nambiyar Nagar, and Tatanagar of the Nagapattinam district of Tamil Nadu, India.
Sevabharathi
|
Old Nambiyar Nagar
|
New Nambiyar Nagar
|
Tatanagar
|
Time from the intervention (d) |
HI |
CI |
HI |
CI |
HI |
CI |
HI |
CI |
1 |
24 |
3.8 |
5.7 |
0.9 |
16.1 |
4.9 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
10.2 |
1.6 |
4.4 |
0.9 |
19.4 |
2.2 |
10 |
2.7 |
3 |
14.1 |
3.5 |
13.5 |
3.1 |
27.3 |
3.8 |
8.8 |
1.1 |
4 |
14.6 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
19.2 |
2 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
5 |
13.3 |
2.2 |
4.1 |
1.3 |
22.2 |
3.5 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
16 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
0.9 |
4.1 |
1.3 |
5.2 |
2.8 |
7 |
14.8 |
1.5 |
17.2 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
0.9 |
5.9 |
2.6 |
8 |
15.4 |
3.7 |
20.9 |
2.7 |
17.2 |
2.7 |
4.8 |
2.4 |
9 |
38.5 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
1.1 |
20.9 |
2.7 |
4.1 |
2 |
10 |
9.5 |
2.1 |
5.9 |
1.6 |
5.4 |
1.1 |
3.8 |
1.6 |
11 |
12.5 |
2 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
4.8 |
1.6 |
3.4 |
1.4 |
12 |
7.4 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
4.2 |
1.6 |
4.1 |
1 |
13 |
3.7 |
1.2 |
4.3 |
0.9 |
3.9 |
1 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
14 |
2.9 |
1.3 |
3 |
0.7 |
2.9 |
2 |
2.7 |
1 |
15 |
1.7 |
0.8 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
Average
|
13.2
|
2.5
|
6.4
|
1.3
|
11.6
|
2.2
|
4.8
|
1.7
|
Table 8The course of larval (AL) indices from the beginning and the end of an outbreak in the urban area of the Nagapattinam district by different supervisory tiers during cross checking of domestic breeding checker (DBC) activities of AL work.
|
Name of the urban areas |
D |
Larval indices from SE cross checks
|
Larval indices from junior entomologist cross checks
|
Larval indices from health inspectors cross checks
|
HI |
CI |
BIa
|
HI |
CI |
BIa
|
HI |
CI |
BIa
|
1 |
Sevabharthi |
1 |
62.1 |
17 |
0 |
24 |
3.8 |
0 |
6.3 |
1.3 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
28.1 |
10.4 |
0 |
10.2 |
1.6 |
0 |
4.1 |
1.1 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
9.4 |
3.1 |
0 |
14.1 |
3.5 |
0 |
6.8 |
4.1 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
8 |
3.2 |
0 |
9.5 |
2.1 |
0 |
8.2 |
1.5 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
5.9 |
1.3 |
0 |
3.7 |
1.2 |
0 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
5.4 |
0.9 |
0 |
5.2 |
1 |
0 |
3.1 |
2.3 |
0 |
|
|
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
4.4 |
1 |
0 |
2.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
2 |
New Nambiyar Nagar |
1 |
13.3 |
2.7 |
0 |
16.1 |
4.9 |
0 |
4.1 |
1.3 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
8.8 |
1.3 |
0 |
19.4 |
2.2 |
0 |
4.2 |
0.9 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
23.5 |
3.7 |
0 |
27.3 |
3.8 |
0 |
17.2 |
2.7 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
15.6 |
3.4 |
0 |
19.2 |
2 |
0 |
20.9 |
2.7 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
22.2 |
3.5 |
0 |
7.2 |
1.1 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
7.8 |
0.9 |
0 |
8.2 |
1 |
0 |
4.2 |
0.7 |
0 |
|
|
7 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
1.2 |
0 |
2.3 |
0.8 |
0 |
3 |
Tatanagar |
1 |
10 |
2.7 |
0 |
9.1 |
2.2 |
0 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
8.8 |
1.1 |
0 |
8 |
1.2 |
0 |
4.2 |
0.6 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
5.5 |
2.4 |
0 |
4.8 |
1 |
0 |
2.3 |
0.7 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
0 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
4.1 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
1.1 |
0 |
2.6 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
0 |
3.1 |
1 |
0 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
0 |
|
|
7 |
2.8 |
1 |
0 |
3.1 |
1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0 |
4 |
Old Nambiyar Nagar |
1 |
5 |
1.2 |
0 |
5.7 |
0.9 |
0 |
5.9 |
1.6 |
0 |
|
|
2 |
4.3 |
1.2 |
0 |
4.4 |
0.9 |
0 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
0 |
|
|
3 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
13.5 |
3.3 |
0 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0 |
|
|
4 |
4.3 |
1.9 |
0 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
0 |
4.3 |
0.9 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
4 |
0.9 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0.7 |
0 |
|
|
6 |
3.3 |
1.3 |
0 |
3.2 |
1.3 |
0 |
2.6 |
0.6 |
0 |
|
|
7 |
4 |
0.9 |
0 |
4.2 |
1 |
0 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
0 |
Table 9Data appraised by the health inspectors of primary health centers (PHCs) and the senior entomologists (SEs).
Days from the intervention
|
Sevabharathi
|
Old Nambiyar Nagar
|
New Nambiyar Nagar
|
Tatanagar
|
HI of SE |
HI of PHC |
HI of SE |
HI of Hinsp |
HI of SE |
HI of Hinsp |
HI of SE |
HI of Hinsp |
1 |
62.1 |
6.3 |
2.8 |
0.5 |
13.3 |
4.1 |
4 |
2.3 |
2 |
28.1 |
4.1 |
5 |
5.9 |
8.8 |
4.2 |
10 |
1.8 |
3 |
9.4 |
6.8 |
4.3 |
2.1 |
23.5 |
17.2 |
8.8 |
4.2 |
4 |
8 |
8.2 |
5 |
1.2 |
15.6 |
20.9 |
5.5 |
2.3 |
5 |
5.9 |
2.5 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
10 |
7.2 |
4 |
1.9 |
6 |
5.4 |
3.1 |
4 |
3 |
7.8 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
2.6 |
7 |
4 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
2.6 |
6.6 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
1.8 |
Table 10The declining trend of Aedes indices within one incubation (15 days) during the dengue outbreak in the Mukkudal primary health center of the Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu, India.
Date |
Houses checked |
Houses positive with Aedes larvae |
Total containers checked |
Containers positive |
House Index (HI)% |
Container Index (CI)% |
Breteau Index (BI) |
Positive dengue cases confirmed by IgM ELISA |
12 May 2012 |
715 |
95 |
845 |
95 |
13.2 |
11.2 |
13.2 |
6 |
13 May 2012 |
1008 |
197 |
5412 |
197 |
19.5 |
3.6 |
19.5 |
0 |
14 May 2012 |
3159 |
250 |
14,542 |
275 |
8 |
1.8 |
8.7 |
0 |
15 May 2012 |
3519 |
232 |
16,252 |
429 |
6.5 |
2.6 |
12.2 |
0 |
16 May 2012 |
3464 |
261 |
17,607 |
362 |
7.5 |
2 |
10.4 |
0 |
17 May 2012 |
4067 |
263 |
18,864 |
305 |
6.5 |
1.6 |
7.5 |
0 |
18 May 2012 |
2561 |
112 |
11,773 |
155 |
4.3 |
1.3 |
6 |
0 |
19 May 2012 |
3727 |
250 |
14,542 |
275 |
8 |
1.8 |
8.7 |
0 |
20 May 2012 |
592 |
40 |
4883 |
47 |
6.7 |
0.96 |
7.9 |
0 |
21 May 2012 |
3778 |
144 |
18,838 |
165 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
4.4 |
0 |
22 May 2012 |
3277 |
101 |
16,782 |
109 |
3.1 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
0 |
23 May 2012 |
2315 |
66 |
13,913 |
85 |
2.9 |
0.6 |
3.7 |
0 |
24 May 2012 |
2962 |
113 |
16,394 |
140 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
4.7 |
0 |
25 May 2012 |
2691 |
72 |
13,259 |
98 |
2.7 |
0.7 |
3.6 |
0 |
26 May 2012 |
2794 |
84 |
11,042 |
108 |
3 |
0.9 |
3.8 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
6.6
|
2.10
|
7.84
|
|
Table 11The declining trend of Aedes indices in the second incubation (15–30 days) during the dengue outbreak in the Mukkudal primary health center of the Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu, India.
Date |
Houses checked |
Houses positive with Aedes larvae |
Total containers checked |
Containers positive |
House Index(HI)% |
Container Index (CI)% |
Breteau Index(BI) |
Positive dengue cases confirmed by IgM ELISA |
27 May 2012 |
1111 |
31 |
5719 |
49 |
2.8 |
0.9 |
4.4 |
0 |
28 May 2012 |
2929 |
47 |
11,068 |
49 |
1.6 |
0.4 |
1.9 |
0 |
29 May 2012 |
3177 |
34 |
14,438 |
39 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0 |
30 May 2012 |
2961 |
32 |
12,759 |
35 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
0 |
31 May 2012 |
3018 |
30 |
12,941 |
30 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0 |
01 Jun 2012 |
2686 |
52 |
11,825 |
65 |
1.9 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
0 |
02 Jun 2012 |
2404 |
54 |
9632 |
55 |
2.2 |
0.6 |
2.3 |
0 |
03 Jun 2012 |
2199 |
39 |
9568 |
40 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
1.8 |
0 |
04 Jun 2012 |
2866 |
22 |
9733 |
22 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
05 Jun 2012 |
2836 |
37 |
9723 |
41 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
0 |
06 Jun 2012 |
2513 |
19 |
8887 |
19 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
07 Jun 2012 |
2922 |
26 |
12,922 |
26 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0 |
08 Jun 2012 |
2804 |
23 |
11,499 |
23 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
09 Jun 2012 |
2286 |
15 |
8022 |
15 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
1.34 |
0.36 |
1.54 |
|
Table 12The Aedes indices within permissible levels in Nangunery where no dengue positives were reported in May 2012 or June 2012.
Date |
Houses checked |
Houses positive with Aedes larvae |
Total containers checked |
Containers positive |
House Index (HI)% |
Container Index (CI)% |
Breteau Index (BI) |
Positive dengue cases confirmed by IgM ELISA |
25 May 2012 |
5905 |
101 |
11,321 |
244 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
4.1 |
0 |
26 May 2012 |
3553 |
78 |
7644 |
114 |
2.1 |
1.5 |
3.2 |
0 |
27 May 2012 |
3338 |
48 |
6215 |
56 |
1.6 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
0 |
28 May 2012 |
4929 |
89 |
10,162 |
101 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
0 |
29 May 2012 |
4523 |
85 |
9487 |
105 |
1.8 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
0 |
30 May 2012 |
3945 |
71 |
8326 |
87 |
1.7 |
1.0 |
2.2 |
0 |
31 May 2012 |
4024 |
78 |
9280 |
97 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
2.4 |
0 |
01 Jun 2012 |
3744 |
70 |
8285 |
106 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
0 |
02 Jun 2012 |
3766 |
86 |
8366 |
127 |
2.2 |
1.5 |
3.4 |
0 |
03 Jun 2012 |
3797 |
80 |
9374 |
114 |
2.1 |
1.2 |
3.0 |
0 |
04 Jun 2012 |
4935 |
71 |
10,931 |
85 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
0 |
05 Jun 2012 |
5587 |
65 |
10,645 |
85 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
0 |
06 Jun 2012 |
4024 |
56 |
8837 |
86 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
2.1 |
0 |
07 Jun 2012 |
4242 |
86 |
10,343 |
118 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
0 |
08 Jun 2012 |
4384 |
66 |
10,180 |
91 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
0 |
09 Jun 2012 |
4156 |
50 |
9379 |
73 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
0 |
10 Jun 2012 |
4290 |
58 |
8437 |
76 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
1.8 |
0 |
11 Jun 2012 |
4989 |
64 |
11,531 |
88 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
0 |
12 Jun 2012 |
4587 |
65 |
9843 |
65 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
0 |
13 Jun 2012 |
3994 |
46 |
8841 |
66 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
0 |
14 Jun 2012 |
4279 |
62 |
9710 |
52 |
1.4 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
0 |
15 Jun 2012 |
4282 |
60 |
4469 |
73 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
0 |
Mean |
|
|
|
|
1.63 |
1.06 |
2.22 |
|
Table 13The Aedes indices within permissible levels in the Cheranmahadevi district where dengue positives had not been reported in May 2012 or June 2012.
Date |
Houses checked |
Houses positive with Aedes larvae |
Total containers checked |
Containers positive |
House Index (HI)% |
Container Index (CI)% |
Breteau Index (BI) |
Positive dengue cases confirmed by IgM ELISA |
25 May 2012 |
5984 |
93 |
20,593 |
93 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
0 |
26 May 2012 |
5409 |
41 |
20,900 |
41 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0 |
27 May 2012 |
60 |
2 |
136 |
2 |
3.3 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
28 May 2012 |
5589 |
27 |
26,498 |
27 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0 |
29 May 2012 |
6240 |
108 |
27,215 |
108 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
1.7 |
0 |
30 May 2012 |
5411 |
21 |
22,569 |
21 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0 |
31 May 2012 |
5911 |
15 |
23,579 |
17 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0 |
01 Jun 2012 |
5139 |
12 |
20,381 |
15 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0 |
02 Jun 2012 |
4626 |
21 |
19,758 |
25 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0 |
03 Jun 2012 |
3094 |
10 |
11,145 |
12 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0 |
04 Jun 2012 |
5314 |
13 |
23,097 |
13 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0 |
05 Jun 2012 |
5312 |
9 |
22,613 |
10 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0 |
06 Jun 2012 |
5524 |
3 |
20,880 |
3 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0 |
07 Jun 2012 |
5569 |
11 |
17,548 |
13 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0 |
08 Jun 2012 |
5073 |
12 |
19,772 |
12 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0 |
09 Jun 2012 |
4310 |
9 |
15,811 |
10 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0 |
10 Jun 2012 |
2947 |
2 |
10,433 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0 |
11 Jun 2012 |
5577 |
8 |
20,929 |
8 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0 |
12 Jun 2012 |
5546 |
8 |
22,586 |
8 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0 |
13 Jun 2012 |
5381 |
9 |
21,861 |
9 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0 |
14 Jun 2012 |
5233 |
10 |
21,395 |
11 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0 |
15 Jun 2012 |
4897 |
8 |
19,089 |
8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0 |
16 Jun 2012 |
5215 |
7 |
2066 |
7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
0.50 |
0.17 |
0.37 |
|
Table 14The number of dengue IgM ELISA confirmed cases and deaths by age and sex in the Mukkudal block of the Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu, India.
Age groups (y) |
Male |
Female |
Deaths
|
Male |
Female |
0–1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1–4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
5–8 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9–14 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
> 15 |
3 |
13 |
0 |
0 |