Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Angie Alexandra Rincón-Real; Martha Cecilia Suárez-Alfonso

doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0033

Articles

Page Path

Review Article

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Angie Alexandra Rincón-Real

, Martha Cecilia Suárez-Alfonso

Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 2022;13(6):407-423.
Published online: December 16, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0033

Molecular Genetics of Pathogens Group, National University of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

Corresponding author: Martha Cecilia Suárez-Alfonso Molecular Genetics of Pathogens Group, Universidad Nacional of Colombia, Carrera 30 # 45-03, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia Edificio 503, Laboratorio de Microbiología Veterinaria, 111321 Bogotá, Colombia E-mail: mcsuarezal@unal.edu.co

• Received: January 24, 2022 • Revised: November 1, 2022 • Accepted: November 15, 2022

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

7,047 Views
219 Download
12 Web of Science
12 Crossref
11 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Supplementary Material
Article information
References

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the presence and geographical distribution of Gram-negative bacteria considered critical on the priority list of antibiotic-resistant pathogens published by the World Health Organization, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp., and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A systematic review of original studies published in 5 databases between 2010 and 2021 was conducted, including genotypically confirmed carbapenem-resistant isolates obtained from canines, felines, and their settings. Fifty-one articles met the search criteria. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were found in domestic canines and felines, pet food, and on veterinary-medical and household surfaces. The review found that the so-called “big five”—that is, the 5 major carbapenemases identified worldwide in Enterobacterales (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase, active-on-imipenem, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, and oxacillin [OXA]-48-like)—and the 3 most important carbapenemases from Acinetobacter spp. (OXA-23-like, OXA-40-like, and OXA-58-like) had been detected in 8 species in the Enterobacteriaceae family and 5 species of glucose non-fermenting bacilli on 5 continents. Two publications used molecular analysis to confirm carbapenem-resistant bacteria transmission between owners and dogs. Isolating critically important human carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from domestic canines and felines highlights the importance of including these animal species in surveillance programs and antimicrobial resistance containment plans as part of the One Health approach.
Keywords: Beta-lactam resistance; Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Drug resistance; Gram-negative bacteria; One Health; Pets

Introduction

A systematic analysis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in 2019 found that bacteria-related AMR accounted for 4.5 million deaths worldwide. Moreover, the global burden of AMR will be responsible for 10 million deaths worldwide by 2050 [1]. AMR incurs increased healthcare system costs associated with length of hospital stay, additional follow-up visits, and using drugs of last resort (DoLR) [2−4].

Antimicrobial-resistant infections in clinical and community settings are frequently associated with β-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria [5−7]. Resistance to β-lactams in Gram-negative bacteria occurs due to target site modification, decreased antibiotic concentration resulting from efflux pumps, changes in outer membrane permeability caused by the loss or modifications of porins, and enzymatic inactivation of the drug by β-lactamase production. More than 4.900 β-lactamases have been reported to date [6,8]. β-lactamases can be structurally [9] or functionally classified [10]. Four types are recognized structurally. Types A, C, and D are serine enzymes, and type B includes metallo-β-lactamases [6,8,9].

Carbapenemases are extremely relevant because they hydrolyze carbapenems; β-lactam DoLRs have broad-spectrum activity and stability [6]. Carbapenem resistance (CR) is considered a marker for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative bacteria because it is associated with a wide range of co-resistance to other antimicrobial drugs [11].

According to epidemiological factors related to the degree of global spread of carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, 2 groups of carbapenemases have been proposed for Enterobacterales. The first group comprises the “big five” that are widespread worldwide, and the second group includes the minor or “rare” carbapenemases that have a limited geographical spread [8]. The “big five” carbapenemases include the class A enzyme Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), class B enzymes active-on-imipenem (IMP), Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), and class D enzyme active on oxacillin [OXA]-48-like [8]. Three oxacillinases from the genus Acinetobacter (OXA-23-like, OXA-40-like, and OXA-58-like) have been reported as of concern due to their worldwide spread [12,13].

The World Health Organization (WHO) published a global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide the discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics in 2017. The most important category on the list (i.e., critical-priority microorganisms) includes the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) family and 2species of carbapeem-resistant, glucose-non-fermenting bacilli (CRGNFB), namely, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, due to their impact on mortality, disease burden, and circulation at the human-animal-environment interface [11].

AMR involves complex human-animal-environment interface-related microbial interactions. Carbapenem use is not recommended for companion animals [14]; however, CR isolates have been reported in these animals [15]. The interactions between owners and companion animals promote AMR dissemination and maintenance through bacterial bidirectional transmission [16]. Thus, a One Health-oriented approach to analyzing carbapenemase circulation in companion animals is essential—that is, an integrated, multisector approach seeking to balance and optimize the health of humans and animals, as well as environmental sustainability [17,18].

Accordingly, this study adopted a One Health perspective for describing the presence and geographic distribution of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria classified as critical on the WHO priority list isolated from domestic canines and felines and the contexts associated with their presence, including CRE, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Materials and Methods

Search Strategy and Selection of Studies

A search for original articles that evaluated antimicrobial susceptibility to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae and glucose non-fermenting bacilli (GNFB), such as Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa obtained from domestic canines or felines, or both, and contexts associated with their presence (e.g., veterinary care, pet food, and/or the animal’s home) in which genotypic CR was detected was carried out. The databases consulted were Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, and CABI: VetMed Resource.

Descriptors from the DeCS/MeSH thesauri were used by applying a specific search formula and combining the following terms: (carbapenemase OR CPE OR carbapenem-resistance) AND (Enterobacteriaceae OR Enterobacterales OR Escherichia coli OR Enterobacter cloacae OR Klebsiella pneumoniae OR Pseudomonas OR Pseudomonas aeruginosa OR Acinetobacter OR Acinetobacter baumannii) AND (companion animals OR pets OR dog OR cat) NOT review (Table S1).

Articles in English, Spanish or Portuguese, published from January 1, 2010 to April 24, 2021 were included. Publications that informed only about isolates from human sources, animals other than canines or felines (origin or unrelated environmental origin), reports of phenotypic resistance without genotypic confirmation, review articles or meta-analyses, editorials, book chapters, proceedings of academic events, evaluation of diagnostic or therapeutic methods of CR bacteria, were excluded.

Duplicates were removed using the Mendeley bibliographic manager ver. 1.19.8 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Two researchers carried out the search and selection independently in 2 phases. The first phase was based on the title and abstract, and the second was involved analyzing the full text. We conducted a manual search of the reference lists of included articles and selected publications according to the previous criteria to ensure better information coverage. Divergences in selection were resolved by consensus.

Data Extraction and Processing

The information was compiled in an Excel sheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). It included the main author, year, country, place, sample collected, year of isolation, animal, population, health status, history of hospitalization or antimicrobial therapy in animals and/or owners, as well as the microorganism identified, number of isolates, sequence type (ST), epidemiological classification of AMR, susceptibility assessment, and the genetic mechanism of CR.

Results

The initial search yielded 368 articles, 192 of which were duplicates. Of these, 91 were discarded according to their title and abstract, and 34 based on the full-text review (Figure 1). Fifty-one articles were included for analysis [19−69].

Study Characterization

Of the 51 articles, 48 reported isolates from domestic canines and/or felines, 3 from veterinary medical care environments, 1 from home environments, and another from commercial food (wet food). Of the 48 publications, 26 included dogs, 4 involved cats, and 18 encompassed both species.

Furthermore, of the 51 publications, 40 were original studies, and 11 were from epidemiological surveillance/monitoring programs. The publications included articles spanning 11 years (2010−2021); however, some CR isolates reported a longer period of analysis (Table 1) [19−69].

Animal Clinical History

Of the 51 articles reporting CRE and CRGNFB, most (n=49) described the health status of animals. Four studies involved healthy animals, 38 included diseased animals, and 5 had animals of both statuses. In the reports of diseased animals, CRE isolates were obtained from different systems, including genitourinary, respiratory, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, ear, skin, and soft tissues, as well as neoplasms and wounds of undescribed origin. The CRGNFB were obtained from respiratory, genitourinary, ocular and ear tissues, soft tissues, and systemic examinations (Table 2; Table S2) [19−69].

Twenty articles reported antimicrobial therapy close to the sampling date, previously, or both. Three articles reported the administration of carbapenems (meropenem) in South Korea, and 17 described the use of other antimicrobials, including tetracyclines, cephalosporins, and quinolones, β-lactams, β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, sulfonamides, nitroimidazoles, and phosphonic acids (Table 2).

CR Bacteria Isolated from Domestic Canines and Felines

Twenty publications reported information on the frequency of animals with CR isolates. In dogs and cats, the proportions of CRE isolation ranged from 0.25% to 21.6%. The frequency of CRE was registered on 3 continents. In Europe, the highest frequency of CRE happened in an outbreak of CR E. coli in dogs in a veterinary hospital in Switzerland (21.65%). In Asia, the highest frequency of CRE was in dogs in veterinary hospitals in India (6.75%). In Africa, the highest frequency of CRE occurred in animals sampled at an official veterinary office in Algeria (2.5%) (Table 3) [19,20,24−28,30−33,44,45,48,56,59,61,63,67].

The frequency of companion animals from CRGNFB isolates ranged from 1.3% to 12.50%. The frequency of CRGNFB was reported on 2 continents. In Asia, the highest frequency of CRGNFB was registered in dogs in a university veterinary hospital in South Korea (12.50%). In Europe, the highest frequency of CRGNFB was in veterinary hospitals in Italy (5.34%) (Table 3).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Evaluation

Antimicrobial susceptibility in publications was evaluated using the agar diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) techniques with standard and automated (Vitek bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, Francia ; Wider (Francisco Soria Melguizo, SA, Madrid, Spain) and Sensitire (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA) broth microdilution and the epsilometry test (Epsilometer test (E test; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). Two publications determined CR only with molecular techniques (Table S3). The MIC values of meropenem, imipenem, and ertapenem associated with CR isolates are presented in Table S3.

Of 49 publications reporting CR phenotypes, 46 showed susceptibility data to antimicrobials other than carbapenems. CRE and CRGNFB exhibited resistance to penicillin; penicillin/β-lactamase inhibitors; cephamycins; first-, second-, third-, and fourth-generation cephalosporins; cephalosporins/β-lactamase inhibitors; monobactams; aminoglycosides; quinolones; sulfonamides; trimethoprim; tetracyclines; phenicols; nitrofurans; glycylcyclines; and polymyxins. Resistance to macrolides was evaluated and reported only in CRE. Susceptibility to phosphonic acids was evaluated, and resistance was reported in CRE and CRGNFB (Table S3). CRE and CRGNFB presented resistance to last-resort antimicrobials such as amikacin, colistin, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and tigecycline in 14, 3, 8, 4, and 3 publications, respectively (Table S3).

MDR isolates were reported in 20 articles in 4 CRE species (E. coli, K. pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and E. cloacae) from companion animals and veterinary care surfaces. Four CRGNFB MDR species (P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, Acinetobacter radioresistens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) obtained from companion animals and domestic environments were reported in 7 articles (Table S3).

The XDR phenotype was reported in 1 publication that highlighted 1 species of CRE (E. coli) from a canine, and 2 publications recording one species of CRGNFB (A. baumannii) obtained from dogs and cats. No isolates showed a PDR phenotype (Table S3).

CR Genotypic Detection

Genotypic CR was confirmed in publications employing 3 single or combined techniques: polymerase chain reaction, microarrays, and whole-genome sequencing (Table S3). In CRE, resistance was associated only with the production of carbapenemases. In companion animals, the “big five” carbapenemases were detected, with higher frequencies of OXA-48-like and NDM, and smaller proportions of KPC, IMP, and VIM. In veterinary environments, only OXA-48-like and NDM were detected. Conversely, only OXA-48 was found in commercial feed. None of the minor carbapenemases were identified in the CRE reported (Table 2).

CR Acinetobacter spp. found in dogs and cats showed carbapenemase production as the only mechanism of resistance, with 2 of the “big five” (i.e., IMP and NDM), and the 3 important members of the genus (i.e., OXA-23-like, OXA-40-like, and OXA-58-like). CR P. aeruginosa was detected in dogs and home environments (sofa) and produced 2 of the 5 major carbapenemases (i.e., IMP and VIM). A CR mechanism different from carbapenemases was detected in a P. aeruginosa isolate from a canine. This mechanism involved the loss of the OprD outer membrane porin. CR S. maltophilia isolated from dogs and cats was associated with the production of L1, a species-intrinsic metallo-carbapenemase (Table 3).

Geographical Distribution of CR Bacteria

CRE and CRGNFB acquired from companion animals were reported in 19 countries on 5 continents: 5 countries from Asia, 2 from the Americas, 9 from Europe, 2 from Africa, and 1 from Oceania (Figures 2 and 3). In companion animal-associated contexts, CRE and CRGNFB were reported in 3 countries on 3 continents: 1 in the Americas, 1 in Africa, and 1 in Europe (Figure 4).

The bla_NDM-5 gene was reported in plasmids only in CRE in Asia, the Americas, Europe, and Africa. The bla_NDM-1 gene in CRE was detected in plasmids and chromosomes in Asia and the Americas; and in CRGNFB, without reporting its genomic location, but only in Europe. The bla_OXA-48, bla_OXA-181, and bla_OXA-244 genes were found in plasmids only in CRE in Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia. The bla_OXA-23, bla_OXA-58, and bla_OXA-72 genes located on plasmids and chromosomes were reported only in CRGNFB in Europe and Asia. The bla_VIM-1 and bla_VIM-4 genes on plasmids were registered in CRE in Europe and Africa, while the bla_VIM-2 gene located on chromosomes and integrons was present in CRGNFB in the Americas and Asia. The bla_KPC-2 and bla_KPC-4 genes in plasmids were found exclusively in CRE in North and South America. The bla_IMP-4 gene located on plasmids was reported only in CRE in Oceania, while the bla_IMP-1 gene, with no registry of its genomic location, and bla_IMP-45 on chromosomes were detected in CRGNFB in Asia (Table 1; Figures 2–4).

Multilocus STs in CR Bacteria

In publications that established the STs of CR bacteria identified by the molecular epidemiology technique of multilocus sequence typing, 55 STs were reported in CR isolates from companion animals, and 4 had descriptions of the contexts associated with their presence. Eight publications registered no STs. In CRE carrying bla_NDM genes, 4 STs (ST4656, ST167, ST410, and ST9437) were reported on all continents except Oceania. CRE carrying bla_VIM genes were clustered into 3 STs (ST2090, ST493, and ST182) in Africa and Europe, and CRGNFB into 3 STs (ST1047, ST1203, and ST233) in Asia and the Americas. Bacteria carrying bla_IMP had the ST19 sequence in Oceania and the ST308 sequence in Asia in CRE and CRGNFB, respectively. Two STs (ST11 and ST171) were identified in bla_KPC-producing CRE in the Americas (ST11, ST171). Bacteria carrying bla_OXA had the widest variety of STs, with 39 in CRE in Asia, the Americas, Europe, and Africa and 5 in CRGNFB (ST1, ST10, ST2, ST25, and ST93) in Europe and Asia (Table 1; Figures 2–4).

CR Isolations from Companion Animals Related to Humans and Other Animal Species

Eleven studies that reported CR isolates in dogs and cats also registered other animal species, including pigs, birds (poultry, pet, and wild), cattle, sheep, goats, guinea pigs, rats, mice, rabbits, horses, fish, and flies. Seven publications reported CR in humans. Two were from hospital and community settings not related to companion animals, 2 from owners and employees in veterinary care settings, and 1 from backyard swine farm residents.

In addition, 2 articles molecularly confirmed human-animal transmission from owners to dogs. CRE in Finland and CRGNFB in Brazil showed confirmed transmission with the same types of sequences and CR genes found in dogs. Both owners reported previous hospitalization, and 1 of them had also traveled internationally [34,54] (Table S4).

Discussion

The current review compiled evidence on the presence and spread on 5 continents of Gram-negative bacteria categorized as critical in the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria for research and development of new antibiotics, such as CRE and CRGNFB isolated from domestic canines and felines, and on the contexts associated with their presence.

Only 20% of the studies originated from surveillance programs, all in high-income and upper-middle-income countries. Since 2018, the United States has included dogs and cats in AMR surveillance programs [70,71]. In Europe, some countries included both species in their specific AMR control programs, and the European Union plans to launch the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network in Veterinary Medicine (EARS-Vet), in which dogs and cats will be included in the scope of surveillance [72,73].

However, the role of domestic canines and felines in CR bacterial transmission is often underestimated in local AMR containment programs [74,75]. Although in this study, the CR frequency in domestic canines and felines ranges from 0.4% to 6%, it is essential to integrate these animals into surveillance, control, and prevention strategies for CR, especially in low- and lower-middle-income countries where the problem may be underdiagnosed [76].

Of particular concern are reports of VIM-2-producing P. aeruginosa [61] and an outbreak of OXA-181-producing E. coli [20] in veterinary hospitals in South Korea and Switzerland, with frequencies close to 12% and 20%, respectively. Although neither of those 2 reports described the administration of carbapenems, the use of meropenem in veterinary hospitals in South Korea [22,32,68] and the use of β-lactams and quinolones in the Swiss veterinary hospital have been registered, favoring the co-selection of CR isolates [34,59,77].

Carbapenemase production was the most important mechanism of CR in Enterobacterales and GNFB of companion animals. The most frequent carbapenemase was OXA. Most OXA enzymes with carbapenemase activity have been identified in Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa [78]. The carbapenemases OXA-23-like (variant OXA-23), OXA-40-like (variant OXA-72), and OXA-58-like (variant OXA-58) were only identified in Acinetobacter spp. in companion animals from Europe and South Asia.

However, the OXA-48-like enzyme in humans has been reported mainly in K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and E. cloacae [79], and it has been identified in pets, related environments, and food (variants OXA-48, OXA-181, and OXA-244). All were plasmid-encoded, confirming the risk posed by their rapid and easy transfer [79].

The bla_OXA-48 gene detected in the European countries in animal feed might be associated with the components of the feed formulation. bla_OXA-48 has also been reported on Enterobacteriaceae obtained from poultry and swine carcasses in Europe and Asia [80] and drinking water systems of industrialized countries (United States) [81]. Conversely, the most likely source in this case, is human intervention during manufacturing and before packing [50], suggesting the relevance of humans in contaminating animal feed with CR organisms.

The second most frequent enzyme found in this review was NDM in E. coli, E. cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and A. radioresistens in companion animals in North America, Asia, Europe, and North African veterinary settings. NDM is considered endemic in the Balkan countries, the Middle East, and India, although it has spread worldwide, mainly through E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter spp. [81−83]. E. coli ST101 and ST131 and K. pneumoniae ST11 and ST147 have been reported as epidemic clones responsible for its dissemination [81,83,84]. In E. coli, NDM was localized on plasmids. Nevertheless, E. coli presented ST167 and ST410 sequences, suggesting different dynamics in the circulation of NDM-producing E. coli in companion animals.

Domestic canines and felines are not considered the main sources of CR acquisition for humans [81]. However, the transmission of CRE and CRGNFB from humans to dogs, from which the same microorganisms were isolated, has been reported in Finland [34] and Brazil [54], respectively. In both cases, the owners had a history of international travel or prolonged hospitalization, which are risk factors associated with CR acquisition [78,81].

At the human-animal interface, the role of domestic canines and felines in CR dissemination in community settings should not be underestimated. In Brazil, the transmission of a CR bacterium between an owner and pet was confirmed, as well as its presence on shared household surfaces, such as the sofa [54]. The home can become a source of CR bacteria for companion animals, contributing to AMR spread in human environments. Canines, due to their generally more social behavior than felines, interact daily with other congeners and with people outside their family context, including at parks, daycare centers, shelters/kennels, and veterinary hospitals [85], favoring the spread/increase of the presence of CR bacteria in community settings.

The presence of plasmid-borne IMP carbapenemase detected in the zoonotic bacterium Salmonella serovar Typhimurium in hospitalized cats in Australia [35] is of particular concern. Its presence could be attributed to human factors, considering that the circulation of the bla_IMP gene has been demonstrated in Gram-negative bacteria in Australian human clinical settings and in migratory birds carrying CR Salmonella spp. acquired from human environments and genetically related to human isolates [86].

Companion animals may also be involved in the spread of AMR in rural settings. A Chinese backyard pig farm reported CRE circulation in humans, birds, and flies, predominantly originating from canine gene complexes [19]. Human and animal populations that coexist in small-scale agricultural productions with insufficient biosecurity measures have been reported to be more vulnerable to acquiring CR [76]. In rural settings, the use of carbapenems may be lower due to the associated cost. However, using other antimicrobials that may favor co-selection and the occurrence of CR cannot be ruled out [34,59,77].

The limitations of the current review include the fact that it was based only on studies published in electronic databases, and some valid reports of carbapenemases in companion animals in the gray literature may not have been identified unknown. Furthermore, low- and lower-middle-income countries may have been underrepresented due to the absence of publications in electronic databases. In addition, methods of isolation and detection of CR bacteria, phenotypic interpretation criteria, and the classification of resistant, intermediate, and susceptible isolates varied between the studies, and these factors may have influenced the collective results.

Conclusion

In conclusion, evidence of the presence of CRE and CRGNFB from companion animals and associated contexts in the 5 continents is compiled in this review. Domestic canines and felines are recognized as a possible source of dissemination and maintenance of carbapenemases for animals and humans. Thus, there is an urgent need for in-depth studies on the dynamics of CR circulation, including companion animals, under the concept of One Health in CR surveillance programs and plans for the containment of AMR, especially in low- and lower-middle-income countries, where the magnitude of the problem may be underestimated.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data are available at https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0033.

Table S1.

Search formula details and results from the included databases

j-phrp-2022-0033-suppl1.pdf

Table S2.

Health status and antimicrobial use of the animals from which carbapenem-resistant isolates were derived

j-phrp-2022-0033-suppl2.pdf

Table S3.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), inhibition zone diameter (IZD), and carbapenem resistance (CR) mechanisms of isolates obtained from companion animals and the contexts associated with their presence

j-phrp-2022-0033-suppl3.pdf

Table S4.

Carbapenem resistant (CR) isolates from companion animals linked to humans and other species

j-phrp-2022-0033-suppl4.pdf

Article information

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Availability of Data

All data generated or analyzed in this study were included in this published article. More information can be requested from the corresponding author.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the search and selection of articles for this systematic review on carbapenem resistance (CR) in companion animals and related context.

Figure 2.

Number of reports and distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from domestic canines and felines in (A) America and (B) Europe.

ST, sequence type; OXA, oxacillin; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; NR, not reported.

Figure 3.

Number of reports and distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from domestic canines and felines in Africa, Asia, and Oceania.

ST, sequence type; OXA, oxacillin; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; IMP, active-on-imipenem; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; NR, not reported.

Figure 4.

Number of reports and global distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from veterinary environments, homes, and commercial foods for domestic canines and felines.

ST, sequence type; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; OXA, oxacillin; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase.

Table 1.

Geographical distribution of CR isolates obtained from canines and felines, their settings, and the study type

Table 1.
Country	First author	Microorganism	CR mechanism^a)	Genetic location	Study type
Companion animals
China	Li et al. [19]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Wang et al. [21]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Cui et al. [31]	ENB	NDM-1	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Liu et al. [39]	ENB	OXA-48	NR	Investigation (search)
	Wang et al. [53]	GNFB	IMP-45	Chromosome	Surveillance
South Korea	Hong et al. [22]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Hong et al. [32]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Hong et al. [45]	ENB	NDM-5	NR	Surveillance
	Oh et al. [68]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Monitoring
	Hyun et al. [61]	GNFB	VIM-2	Integron class I	Investigation (search)
India	Pruthvishree et al. [46]	ENB	NDM-1	NR	Investigation (report)
India	Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Japan	Kimura et al. [65]	GNFB	IMP-1	NR	Surveillance
Pakistan	Taj et al. [66]	GNFB	OXA-23	NR	Investigation (report)
Brazil	Sellera et al. [42]	ENB	KPC-2	Plasmid	Surveillance
Brazil	Fernandes et al. [54]	GNFB	VIM-2	Chromosome	Investigation (report and search)
United States	Liu et al. [36]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Daniels et al. [41]	ENB	KPC-4	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Shaheen et al. [47]	ENB	NDM-1	Plasmid and chromosome	Investigation (search)
	Tyson et al. [60]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Cole et al. [69]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Germany	Pulss et al. [25]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Stolle et al. [29]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Schmiedel et al. [37]	ENB	OXA-48	NR	Investigation (search)
	Ewers et al. [55]	GNFB	OXA-23	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Ewers et al. [57]	GNFB	OXA-23	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Klotz et al. [63]	GNFB	OXA-58	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Spain	Gonzalez-Torralba et al. [33]	ENB	VIM-1	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Finland	Gronthal et al. [34]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report and search)
France	Valat et al. [23]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Melo et al. [48]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Herivaux et al. [56]	GNFB	OXA-23	NR	Investigation (search)
	Lupo et al. [64]	GNFB	OXA-23	Chromosome	Surveillance
Italy	Alba et al. [49]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Italy	Gentilini et al. [59]	GNFB	NDM-1, OXA-23, L1^b), LP	NR	Investigation (search)
Portugal	Brilhante et al. [26]	ENB	OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Portugal	Pomba et al. [58]	GNFB	OXA-23	Chromosome	Investigation (report)
United Kingdom	Reynolds et al. [24]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
Serbia	Misic et al. [62]	GNFB	OXA-72	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Switzerland	Nigg et al. [20]	ENB	OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Brilhante et al. [38]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Dazio et al. [40]	ENB	NDM-5, OXA-48, OXA-181	NR	Investigation (search)
	Peterhans et al. [43]	ENB	NDM- 5	Plasmid	Investigation (NR)
Algeria	Yousfi et al. [27]	ENB	OXA-48, NDM-5	NR	Investigation (search)
	Yousfi et al. [28]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Mairi et al. [30]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Egypt	Khalifa et al. [44]	ENB	VIM-4, OXA-48, OXA-244	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Australia	Abraham et al. [35]	ENB	IMP-4	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Context associated with companion animals^c)
Brazil	Fernandes et al. [54]	GNFB	VIM-2	Chromosome	Investigation (report and search)
Egypt	Ramadan et al. [51]	ENB	NDM-5, OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Switzerland	Brilhante et al. [38]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Seiffert et al. [50]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Schmidt et al. [52]	ENB	OXA-48, OXA-181	NR	Investigation (search)

CR, carbapenem resistant; ENB, enterobacteria; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; OXA, oxacillin; NR, not reported; GNFB, glucose non-fermenting bacilli; IMP, active-on-imipenem; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; LP, loss of porine.

^a)Carbapenemase production or loss of porins.

^b)Intrinsic metallo-β-lactamase L1 of the species Stenotrophomonas maltophilia encoded by chromosomes.

^c)Veterinary medical care surfaces, household surfaces, and companion animal food.

Table 2.

CR in microorganisms isolated from canine and feline samples and their history of antimicrobial use

Table 2.
Study	Sample origin			Antimicrobial use		Carbapenem resistance
Study	Animal	n	Specimen	Carbapenem	Others	Bacterial species	CR origin^a)
Li et al. [19]	Dogs	2	Stool	NR	NR	Escherichia coli	NDM-5
Nigg et al. [20]	Dogs, cats	21	Rectal swab	NO	PEN, BET/INHIB, QUIN, NIT, CEP, TET, SUL	E. coli	OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Wang et al. [21]	Dogs, cats	6	Stool, urine	NR	NR	E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii	NDM-5
Hong et al. [22]	Dogs, cats	2	Rectal swab	MERO	QUIN, CEP, TET	E. coli	NDM-5
Valat et al. [23]	Dogs	1	NR	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Reynolds et al. [24]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NO	BET/INHIB, CEP, TET, QUIN	E. coli	NDM-5
Pulss et al. [25]	Dogs, cats	130	CVADs^c), urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NO	CEP 2°, 3°, PEN, QUIN, BET/INHB	Klebsiella pneumoniae/Klebsiella oxytoca, E. cloacae, E. coli	OXA-48
Brilhante et al. [26]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Yousfi et al. [27]	Dogs, cats	5	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48, NDM-5
Yousfi et al. [28]	Dogs, cats	6	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae	OXA-48
Stolle et al. [29]	Dogs	6	CVADs^c), tissues^b), stool, urine, other fluids^d)	NO	PEN, BET/INHIB, QUIN, CEP, 3° TET	K. pneumoniae, E. coli	OXA-48
Mairi et al. [30]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Cui et al. [31]	Dogs	1	Anal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Hong et al. [32]	Dogs	4	Rectal swab	MERO	CEP 1°, QUIN, BET/INHIB, NIT	E. coli	NDM-5
Gonzalez-Torralba et al.[33]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NO	NO	K. pneumoniae	VIM-1
Gronthal et al. [34]	Dogs	2	Ear swab	NO	QUIN, CEP 1°, BET/INHIB, LIN	E. coli	NDM-5
Abraham et al. [35]	Cats	4	Stool	NO	TET	Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium	IMP-4
Liu et al. [36]	Dogs, cats	NR	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Schmiedel et al. [37]	Dogs, cats	NR	NR	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae	OXA-48
Brilhante et al. [38]	Dogs, cats	10	Urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Liu et al. [39]	Dogs	NR	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Dazio et al. [40]	Dogs, cats	25	Rectal swab	NO	NR	E. coli	NDM-5, OXA-48, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Dazio et al. [40]	Dogs, cats	25	Rectal swab	NO	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Daniels et al. [41]	Dogs	2	Urine, tissues^b)	NO	TET	Enterobacter. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis	KPC-4
Sellera et al. [42]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	KPC-2
Peterhans et al. [43]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Khalifa et al. [44]	Dogs, cats	7	Nasal swab, eye swab	NR	NR	E. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis	VIM-4
						K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
						E. coli	OXA-244 (OXA-48-like)
Hong et al. [45]	Dogs	4	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Pruthvishree et al. [46]	Dogs	1	Other fluids^d)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Shaheen et al. [47]	Dogs, cats	6	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Melo et al. [48]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NO	BET/INHIB	E. coli	OXA-48
Alba et al. [49]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Wang et al. [53]	Dogs	1	Anal swab	NR	NR	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	IMP-45
Fernandes et al. [54]	Dogs	1	Oral swab, rectal swab, other fluids^d)	NR	NR	P. aeruginosa	VIM-2
Ewers et al. [55]	Dogs, cats	3	Vaginal swab, urine, other fluids^d)	NR	NR	Acinetobacter baumannii	OXA-23
Herivaux et al. [56]	Dogs	2	Oral swab, rectal swab	NO	NO	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Ewers et al. [57]	Cats	1	Urine	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Pomba et al. [58]	Cats	1	Urine	NO	BET/INHB	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Gentilini et al. [59]	Dogs, cats	11	Rectal swab	NO	BET/INHIB, TET, QUIN, NIT	A. radioresistens	NDM-1
						A. baumannii	OXA-23
						P. aeruginosa	Loss of porin^e)
						Stenotrophomonas maltophilia	L1^f)
Tyson et al. [60]	Dogs	1	Other fluids^d)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Hyun et al. [61]	Dogs	10	Other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	P. aeruginosa	VIM- 2
Misic et al. [62]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-72 (OXA-40-like)
Klotz et al. [63]	Dogs, cats	4	Nasal swab, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	Acinetobacter pittii	OXA-58 (OXA-58-like)
Lupo et al. [64]	Dogs, cats	7	NR	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Kimura et al. [65]	Dogs, cats	2	Urine, other fluids^d)	NO	PHOS	A. radioresistens	IMP-1
Taj et al. [66]	Cats	1	Urine	NO	BET/ INHIB, QUIN	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	Dogs	16	Rectal swab, vaginal swab, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Oh et al. [68]	Dogs	4	Stool, nasal swab, urine	MERO	BET/ INHIB, TET	E. coli	NDM-5
Cole et al. [69]	Dogs, cats	6	Urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NO	PEN, CEP, AMN, NIT, BET/ INHIB	E. coli	NDM-5
Brilhante et al. [38]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Seiffert et al. [50]	Pet food^g)	NA	Pet food packages	NA		Enterobacterales (undetermined species)	OXA-48
Ramadan et al. [51]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		E. coli	NDM-5, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Schmidt et al. [52]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		E. coli	OXA-48, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
						K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
						E. cloacae	OXA-48
Fernandes et al. [54]	Household surfaces^h)	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		P. aeruginosa	VIM-2

CR, carbapenem resistant; NR, not reported; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; NO, non-use; PEN, penicillins; BET/INHIB, beta-lactams/beta-lactam inhibitors; QUIN, quinolones; NIT, nitroimidazoles; CEP, cephalosporins; TET, tetracyclines; SUL, sulfonamides; OXA, oxacillin; MERO, meropenem; CVADs, central venous access devices; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; LIN, lincosamides; IMP, active-on-imipenem; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; PHOS, phosphonic acids; NA, not applicable; AMN, aminoglycosides.

^a)Referred to the mechanism that confers resistance to the microorganism: production of carbapenemases or loss of the bacterial target.

^b)Included wound tissues, nasal structure, skin, abdominal cavity, anal sacs, intestine, and lung.

^c)Included central venous catheters.

^d)Included bronchoalveolar and tracheobronchial lavage, scrotal fluid, pus, bile, ear discharge, and eye discharge.

^e)The authors determined that the loss of the oprD porin was caused by different mutations within the gene that caused a premature stop codon because of a large insertion, a frameshift, or a nonsense mutation.

^f)Chromosome-encoded intrinsic metallo-β-lactamase L1 of S. maltophilia species.

^g)Mixed wet pet food with different flavors.

^h)Home surfaces (sofa, balcony, water cooler).

Table 3.

Frequency of animals with CR isolates

Table 3.
First author	Country	Isolation place	Sampled animals (n)			Animals with CR microorganisms (n)			Frequency of animals with CR (%)
First author	Country	Isolation place	Dogs	Cats	Total	Dogs	Cats	Total	Dogs	Cats	Total
Li et al. [19]	China	Households with backyard pig farms	92	19	111	2	0	2	2.17	0.00	1.80
Nigg et al. [20]	Switzerland	University veterinary hospital	76	21	97	17	4	21	22.37	19.05	21.65
Reynolds et al. [24]	United Kingdom	Veterinary clinics	158	27	185	1	0	1	0.63	0.00	0.54
Pulss et al. [25]	Germany	Veterinary microbiology laboratory	3,375	932	4,307	117	13	130	3.47	1.39	3.02
Brilhante et al. [26]	Portugal	Homes and university veterinary hospital	71	27	98	1	0	1	1.41	0.00	1.02
Yousfi et al. [27]	Algeria	Local veterinary office	116	84	200	3	2	5	2.59	2.38	2.50
Yousfi et al. [28]	Algeria	Local veterinary office and homes	265	49	314	4	2	6	1.51	4.08	1.91
Mairi et al. [30]	Algeria	NR	75	37	112	1	0	1	1.33	0.00	0.89
Cui et al. [31]	China	University veterinary hospital	NR	NR	226	1	0	1	NA	NA	0.44
Hong et al. [32]	South Korea	Veterinary clinics	353	0	353	4	0	4	1.13	0.00	1.13
Gonzalez-Torralba et al. [33]	Spain	Companion animal shelter	160	0	160	1	0	1	0.63	0.00	0.63
Khalifa et al. [44]	Egypt	NR	NR	NR	1,348	3	4	7	NA	NA	0.52
Hong et al. [45]	South Korea	Veterinary hospitals	315	74	389	4	0	4	1.27	0.00	1.03
Melo et al. [48]	France	University veterinary hospital	166	227	393	1	0	1	0.60	0.00	0.25
Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	India	Veterinary clinics and university veterinary hospital	237	0	237	16	0	16	6.75	0.00	6.75
Herivaux et al. [56]	France	University veterinary hospital	104	46	150	2	0	2	1.92	0.00	1.33
Gentilini et al. [59]	Italy	Veterinary hospitals and homes	134	72	206	8	3	11	5.97	4.17	5.34
Hyun et al. [61]	South Korea	Veterinary medical teaching hospital	80	0	80	10	0	10	12.5	0.00	12.50
Klotz et al. [63]	Germany	Veterinary clinics	110	48	158	2	2	4	1.82	4.17	2.53

CR, carbapenem resistant; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.

References

1. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022;399:629−55.
PubMed
PMC
2. Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathog Glob Health 2015;109:309−18.
Article
PubMed
PMC
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf.
4. Lemos EV, de la Hoz FP, Alvis N, et al. Impact of carbapenem resistance on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection in Colombia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:174−80.
Article
PubMed
5. Gottig S, Gruber TM, Higgins PG, et al. Detection of pan drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2578−9.
Article
PubMed
6. Bush K. The importance of β-lactamases to the development of new β-lactams. Edited by Mayers DL, Sobel JD, Ouellette M, et al.: Antimicrobial drug resistance. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp 165−74.
7. Lv L, Zeng Z, Song Q, et al. Emergence of XDR Escherichia coli carrying both blaNDM and mcr-1 genes in chickens at slaughter and the characterization of two novel blaNDM-bearing plasmids. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:2261−3.
Article
PubMed
8. Bonnin RA, Jousset AB, Emeraud C, et al. Genetic diversity, biochemical properties, and detection methods of minor carbapenemases in Enterobacterales. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;7:616490.
Article
PubMed
PMC
9. Ambler RP. The structure of beta-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1980;289:321−31.
PubMed
10. Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:969−76.
Article
PubMed
PDF
11. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:318−27.
PubMed
12. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom 2019;5:e000306.
Article
PubMed
PMC
13. Mentasti M, Prime K, Sands K, et al. Rapid detection of OXA-23-like, OXA-24-like, and OXA-58-like carbapenemases from Acinetobacter species by real-time PCR. J Hosp Infect 2020;105:741−6.
Article
PubMed
14. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP), Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Categorisation of antibiotics in the European Union [Internet]. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/categorisation-antibiotics-european-union-answer-request-european-commission-updating-scientific_en.pdf.
15. Abraham S, Wong HS, Turnidge J, et al. Carbapenemase-producing bacteria in companion animals: a public health concern on the horizon. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1155−7.
Article
PubMed
16. Pomba C, Rantala M, Greko C, et al. Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72:957−68.
Article
PubMed
17. One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), Adisasmito WB, Almuhairi S, et al. One Health: a new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog 2022;18:e1010537.
Article
PubMed
PMC
18. Collignon PJ, McEwen SA. One Health: its importance in helping to better control antimicrobial resistance. Trop Med Infect Dis 2019;4:22.
Article
PubMed
PMC
19. Li J, Bi Z, Ma S, et al. Inter-host transmission of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli among humans and backyard animals. Environ Health Perspect 2019;127:107009.
Article
PubMed
PMC
20. Nigg A, Brilhante M, Dazio V, et al. Shedding of OXA-181 carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli from companion animals after hospitalisation in Switzerland: an outbreak in 2018. Euro Surveill 2019;24:1900071.
Article
PubMed
PMC
21. Wang J, Xia YB, Huang XY, et al. Emergence of blaNDM-5 in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from companion animals in Guangzhou, China. Microb Drug Resist 2021;27:809−15.
Article
PubMed
22. Hong JS, Song W, Jeong SH. Molecular characteristics of NDM-5-producing Escherichia coli from a cat and a dog in South Korea. Microb Drug Resist 2020;26:1005−8.
Article
PubMed
23. Valat C, Drapeau A, Beurlet S, et al. Pathogenic Escherichia coli in dogs reveals the predominance of ST372 and the human-associated ST73 extra-intestinal lineages. Front Microbiol 2020;11:580.
Article
PubMed
PMC
24. Reynolds ME, Phan HT, George S, et al. Occurrence and characterization of Escherichia coli ST410 co-harbouring blaNDM-5, blaCMY-42 and blaTEM-190 in a dog from the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019;74:1207−11.
Article
PubMed
25. Pulss S, Stolle I, Stamm I, et al. Multispecies and clonal dissemination of OXA-48 carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae from companion animals in Germany, 2009-2016. Front Microbiol 2018;9:1265.
Article
PubMed
PMC
26. Brilhante M, Menezes J, Belas A, et al. OXA-181-producing extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli sequence type 410 isolated from a dog in Portugal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020;64:e02298−19.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
27. Yousfi M, Touati A, Mairi A, et al. Emergence of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from companion animals in Algeria. Microb Drug Resist 2016;22:342−6.
Article
PubMed
28. Yousfi M, Touati A, Muggeo A, et al. Clonal dissemination of OXA-48-producing Enterobacter cloacae isolates from companion animals in Algeria. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018;12:187−91.
Article
PubMed
29. Stolle I, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Stamm I, et al. Emergence of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in dogs. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68:2802−8.
Article
PubMed
30. Mairi A, Pantel A, Ousalem F, et al. OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales in different ecological niches in Algeria: clonal expansion, plasmid characteristics and virulence traits. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019;74:1848−55.
Article
PubMed
PDF
31. Cui L, Lei L, Lv Y, et al. blaNDM-1-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from a companion dog in China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018;13:24−7.
Article
PubMed
32. Hong JS, Song W, Park HM, et al. First detection of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-5-producing Escherichia coli from companion animals in Korea. Microb Drug Resist 2019;25:344−9.
Article
PubMed
33. Gonzalez-Torralba A, Oteo J, Asenjo A, et al. Survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in companion dogs in Madrid, Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:2499−501.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
34. Gronthal T, Osterblad M, Eklund M, et al. Sharing more than friendship: transmission of NDM-5 ST167 and CTX-M-9 ST69 Escherichia coli between dogs and humans in a family, Finland, 2015. Euro Surveill 2018;23:1700497.
PubMed
PMC
35. Abraham S, O’Dea M, Trott DJ, et al. Isolation and plasmid characterization of carbapenemase (IMP-4) producing Salmonella enterica Typhimurium from cats. Sci Rep 2016;6:35527.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
36. Liu X, Thungrat K, Boothe DM. Occurrence of OXA-48 carbapenemase and other β-lactamase genes in ESBL-producing multidrug resistant Escherichia coli from dogs and cats in the United States, 2009-2013. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1057.
Article
PubMed
PMC
37. Schmiedel J, Falgenhauer L, Domann E, et al. Multiresistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from humans, companion animals and horses in central Hesse, Germany. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:187.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
38. Brilhante M, Gobeli Brawand S, Endimiani A, et al. Two high-risk clones of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that cause infections in pets and are present in the environment of a veterinary referral hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021;76:1140−9.
Article
PubMed
PDF
39. Liu X, Liu H, Li Y, et al. High prevalence of β-lactamase and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli from dogs in Shaanxi, China. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1843.
Article
PubMed
PMC
40. Dazio V, Nigg A, Schmidt JS, et al. Acquisition and carriage of multidrug-resistant organisms in dogs and cats presented to small animal practices and clinics in Switzerland. J Vet Intern Med 2021;35:970−9.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
41. Daniels JB, Chen L, Grooters SV, et al. Enterobacter cloacae complex sequence type 171 isolates expressing KPC-4 carbapenemase recovered from canine patients in Ohio. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018;62:e01161−18.
Article
PMC
PDF
42. Sellera FP, Fuga B, Fontana H, et al. Detection of IncN-pST15 one-health plasmid harbouring blaKPC-2 in a hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae CG258 isolated from an infected dog, Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis 2021;68:3083−8.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
43. Peterhans S, Stevens MJA, Nuesch-Inderbinen M, et al. First report of a blaNDM-5-harbouring Escherichia coli ST167 isolated from a wound infection in a dog in Switzerland. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018;15:226−7.
Article
PubMed
44. Khalifa HO, Oreiby AF, Abd El-Hafeez AA, et al. First report of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing bacteria coharboring mcr-9 associated with respiratory disease complex in pets: potential of animal-human transmission. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020;65:e01890−20.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
45. Hong JS, Song W, Park HM, et al. Clonal spread of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae between companion animals and humans in South Korea. Front Microbiol 2019;10:1371.
Article
PubMed
PMC
46. Pruthvishree BS, Vinodh Kumar OR, Sivakumar M, et al. Molecular characterization of extensively drug resistant (XDR), extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and New Delhi Metallo beta-lactamase-1 (blaNDM1) producing Escherichia coli isolated from a male dog-a case report. Vet Arh 2018;88:139−48.
Article
47. Shaheen BW, Nayak R, Boothe DM. Emergence of a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1)-encoding gene in clinical Escherichia coli isolates recovered from companion animals in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:2902−3.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
48. Melo LC, Boisson MN, Saras E, et al. OXA-48-producing ST372 Escherichia coli in a French dog. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72:1256−8.
Article
PubMed
49. Alba P, Taddei R, Cordaro G, et al. Carbapenemase IncF-borne blaNDM-5 gene in the E. coli ST167 high-risk clone from canine clinical infection, Italy. Vet Microbiol 2021;256:109045.
Article
PubMed
50. Seiffert SN, Carattoli A, Tinguely R, et al. High prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase, plasmid-mediated AmpC, and carbapenemase genes in pet food. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:6320−3.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
51. Ramadan H, Gupta SK, Sharma P, et al. Circulation of emerging NDM-5-producing Escherichia coli among humans and dogs in Egypt. Zoonoses Public Health 2020;67:324−9.
Article
PubMed
PDF
52. Schmidt JS, Kuster SP, Nigg A, et al. Poor infection prevention and control standards are associated with environmental contamination with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and other multidrug-resistant bacteria in Swiss companion animal clinics. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9:93.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
53. Wang Y, Wang X, Schwarz S, et al. IMP-45-producing multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa of canine origin. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2579−81.
Article
PubMed
54. Fernandes MR, Sellera FP, Moura Q, et al. Zooanthroponotic transmission of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2018;24:1160−2.
Article
PubMed
PMC
55. Ewers C, Klotz P, Leidner U, et al. OXA-23 and ISAba1-OXA-66 class D β-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from companion animals. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017;49:37−44.
Article
PubMed
56. Herivaux A, Pailhories H, Quinqueneau C, et al. First report of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii carriage in pets from the community in France. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016;48:220−1.
Article
PubMed
57. Ewers C, Klotz P, Scheufen S, et al. Genome sequence of OXA-23 producing Acinetobacter baumannii IHIT7853, a carbapenem-resistant strain from a cat belonging to international clone IC1. Gut Pathog 2016;8:37.
Article
PubMed
PMC
58. Pomba C, Endimiani A, Rossano A, et al. First report of OXA-23-mediated carbapenem resistance in sequence type 2 multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii associated with urinary tract infection in a cat. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:1267−8.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
59. Gentilini F, Turba ME, Pasquali F, et al. Hospitalized pets as a source of carbapenem-resistance. Front Microbiol 2018;9:2872.
Article
PubMed
PMC
60. Tyson GH, Li C, Ceric O, et al. Complete genome sequence of a carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli isolate with blaNDM-5 from a dog in the United States. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019;8:e00872−19.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
61. Hyun JE, Chung TH, Hwang CY. Identification of VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from dogs with pyoderma and otitis in Korea. Vet Dermatol 2018;29:186.
Article
PubMed
PDF
62. Misic D, Asanin J, Spergser J, et al. OXA-72-mediated carbapenem resistance in sequence type 1 multidrug (colistin)-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii associated with urinary tract infection in a dog from Serbia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018;62:e00219−18.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
63. Klotz P, Jacobmeyer L, Leidner U, et al. Acinetobacter pittii from companion animals coharboring blaOXA-58, the tet(39) region, and other resistance genes on a single plasmid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017;62:e01993−17.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
64. Lupo A, Chatre P, Ponsin C, et al. Clonal spread of Acinetobacter baumannii sequence type 25 carrying blaOXA-23 in companion animals in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;61:e01881−16.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
65. Kimura Y, Miyamoto T, Aoki K, et al. Analysis of IMP-1 type metallo-β-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter radioresistens isolated from companion animals. J Infect Chemother 2017;23:655−7.
Article
PubMed
66. Taj Z, Rasool MH, Almatroudi A, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii belonging to international clone II from a pet cat with urinary tract infection; the first report from Pakistan. Pol J Microbiol 2020;69:1−4.
Article
67. Bandyopadhyay S, Banerjee J, Bhattacharyya D, et al. Companion animals emerged as an important reservoir of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a report from India. Curr Microbiol 2021;78:1006−16.
Article
PubMed
PDF
68. Oh JY, Sum S, Song WK, et al. Emergence of blaNDM-5-producing Escherichia coli ST410 in companion dogs treated with meropenem. Pak Vet J 2020;40:534−6.
Article
69. Cole SD, Peak L, Tyson GH, et al. New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-5-producing Escherichia coli in companion animals, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:381−3.
Article
PubMed
PMC
70. Ceric O, Tyson GH, Goodman LB, et al. Enhancing the one health initiative by using whole genome sequencing to monitor antimicrobial resistance of animal pathogens: Vet-LIRN collaborative project with veterinary diagnostic laboratories in United States and Canada. BMC Vet Res 2019;15:130.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
71. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Health and Plant Inspection Services. USDA APHIS VS National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) antimicrobial resistance pilot project. Year 1 report: 2018 [Internet]. United States Department of Agriculture: Animal Health and Plant Inspection Services; 2018 [cited 2022 Jun 22]. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahln/downloads/2018%20APHIS%20AMR%20Pilot%20Project%20EOY%20Report-05.01.2019.pdf.
72. Marco-Fuertes A, Marin C, Lorenzo-Rebenaque L, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in companion animals: a new challenge for the One Health approach in the European Union. Vet Sci 2022;9:208.
Article
PubMed
PMC
73. Mader R; EU-JAMRAI, Bourely C, et al. Defining the scope of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance network in Veterinary medicine (EARS-Vet): a bottom-up and One Health approach. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022;77:816−26.
PubMed
PMC
74. Guardabassi L, Schwarz S, Lloyd DH. Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:321−32.
PubMed
75. Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). Reflection paper on the risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals [Internet]. London: European Medicines Agency; 2015 [cited 2021 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-antimicrobial-resistance-transfer-companion-animals_en.pdf.
76. Bandyopadhyay S, Samanta I. Antimicrobial resistance in agri-food chain and companion animals as a re-emerging menace in post-COVID epoch: low-and middle-income countries perspective and mitigation strategies. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:620.
Article
PubMed
PMC
77. Maseda E, Salgado P, Anillo V, et al. Risk factors for colonization by carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria at admission to a Surgical ICU: a retrospective study. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2017;35:333−7.
Article
PubMed
78. Codjoe FS, Donkor ES. Carbapenem resistance: a review. Med Sci (Basel) 2017;6:1.
Article
PubMed
PMC
79. Suay-Garcia B, Perez-Gracia MT. Present and future of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019;8:122.
Article
PubMed
PMC
80. Bonardi S, Pitino R. Carbapenemase-producing bacteria in food-producing animals, wildlife and environment: a challenge for human health. Ital J Food Saf 2019;8:7956.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
81. Taggar G, Attiq Rheman M, Boerlin P, et al. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriales from humans, animals, food and the environment. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020;9:693.
Article
PubMed
PMC
82. Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm! Trends Mol Med 2012;18:263−72.
Article
PubMed
83. Djahmi N, Dunyach-Remy C, Pantel A, et al. Epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Mediterranean countries. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:305784.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
84. Hansen GT. Continuous evolution: perspective on the epidemiology of carbapenemase resistance among Enterobacterales and other Gram-negative bacteria. Infect Dis Ther 2021;10:75−92.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
85. Menchetti L, Calipari S, Mariti C, et al. Cats and dogs: best friends or deadly enemies?: what the owners of cats and dogs living in the same household think about their relationship with people and other pets. PLoS One 2020;15:e0237822.
Article
PubMed
PMC
86. Dolejska M, Masarikova M, Dobiasova H, et al. High prevalence of Salmonella and IMP-4-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the silver gull on Five Islands, Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71:63−70.
Article
PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

NDM-5-plasmid diversity in multiple international high-risk Escherichia coli clones associated with canine and feline extraintestinal infections
Pattrarat Chanchaithong, Parinya Sroithongkham, Chavin Leelapsawas, Komkiew Pinpimai, Jitrapa Yindee, Alexandra Collaud, Vincent Perreten
Veterinary Microbiology.2025; 301: 110338. CrossRef
Staphylococcal skin infection isolates from dogs without recent antibiotic exposure are 100% susceptible to clindamycin
W. Cooper Brookshire, Larry D. Ballard, Vernon C. Langston, Joo Youn Park, Keun-Seok Seo
Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2022–2023

EFSA Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Zoonotic potential of uropathogenic Escherichia coli lineages from companion animals
Nicolas Jousserand, Frédéric Auvray, Camille Chagneau, Laurent Cavalié, Christelle Maurey, Amandine Drut, Rachel Lavoué, Eric Oswald
Veterinary Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
First report of a blaNDM-5-carrying Escherichia coli sequence type 12 isolated from a dog with pyometra in Japan
Kazuki Harada, Tadashi Miyamoto, Michiyo Sugiyama, Tetsuo Asai
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy.2024; 30(9): 938. CrossRef
The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2021–2022

EFSA Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidemiological analysis and prevention strategies in response to a shigellosis cluster outbreak: a retrospective case series in an alternative school in the Republic of Korea, 2023
Yeongseo Ahn, Sunmi Jin, Gemma Park, Hye Young Lee, Hyungyong Lee, Eunkyung Shin, Junyoung Kim, Jaeil Yoo, Yuna Kim
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives.2024; 15(1): 68. CrossRef
Carbapenem Resistance in Animal-Environment-Food from Africa: A Systematic Review, Recommendations and Perspectives
Komla Dossouvi, Ayawovi Selom Ametepe
Infection and Drug Resistance.2024; Volume 17: 1699. CrossRef
Identification of blaOXA-23 gene in resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from cows and humans in Basra province, Iraq
Alyaa Sabti Jasim, Abeer Laily Mohammed, Wameedh Hashim Abbas, Hanaa Khaleel Ibraheim, Hasanain A.J. Gharban
Veterinary World.2024; : 1629. CrossRef
The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2020/2021

EFSA Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Resistome-based surveillance identifies ESKAPE pathogens as the predominant gram-negative organisms circulating in veterinary hospitals
Flavia Zendri, Cajsa M. Isgren, Jane Devaney, Vanessa Schmidt, Rachel Rankin, Dorina Timofte
Frontiers in Microbiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Unveiling the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens in exotic pets from France: a comprehensive study (2017-2019)
Sandro Cardoso, Aurélie Le Loc’h, Inês Marques, Anabela Almeida, Sérgio Sousa, Maria José Saavedra, Sofia Anastácio, Eduarda Silveira
One Health & Implementation Research.2023; 3(4): 161. CrossRef

Cite

CITE

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2022;13(6):407-423. Published online December 16, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0033

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
bib — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2022;13(6):407-423. Published online December 16, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0033

Figure

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Figure 1. Flowchart of the search and selection of articles for this systematic review on carbapenem resistance (CR) in companion animals and related context.

Figure 2. Number of reports and distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from domestic canines and felines in (A) America and (B) Europe.ST, sequence type; OXA, oxacillin; KPC, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; NR, not reported.

Figure 3. Number of reports and distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from domestic canines and felines in Africa, Asia, and Oceania.ST, sequence type; OXA, oxacillin; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; IMP, active-on-imipenem; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; NR, not reported.

Figure 4. Number of reports and global distribution of carbapenem resistance genes from Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting bacilli from veterinary environments, homes, and commercial foods for domestic canines and felines.ST, sequence type; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; OXA, oxacillin; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Country	First author	Microorganism	CR mechanism^a)	Genetic location	Study type
Companion animals
China	Li et al. [19]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Wang et al. [21]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Cui et al. [31]	ENB	NDM-1	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Liu et al. [39]	ENB	OXA-48	NR	Investigation (search)
	Wang et al. [53]	GNFB	IMP-45	Chromosome	Surveillance
South Korea	Hong et al. [22]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Hong et al. [32]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Hong et al. [45]	ENB	NDM-5	NR	Surveillance
	Oh et al. [68]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Monitoring
	Hyun et al. [61]	GNFB	VIM-2	Integron class I	Investigation (search)
India	Pruthvishree et al. [46]	ENB	NDM-1	NR	Investigation (report)
India	Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Japan	Kimura et al. [65]	GNFB	IMP-1	NR	Surveillance
Pakistan	Taj et al. [66]	GNFB	OXA-23	NR	Investigation (report)
Brazil	Sellera et al. [42]	ENB	KPC-2	Plasmid	Surveillance
Brazil	Fernandes et al. [54]	GNFB	VIM-2	Chromosome	Investigation (report and search)
United States	Liu et al. [36]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Daniels et al. [41]	ENB	KPC-4	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Shaheen et al. [47]	ENB	NDM-1	Plasmid and chromosome	Investigation (search)
	Tyson et al. [60]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
	Cole et al. [69]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Germany	Pulss et al. [25]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Stolle et al. [29]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Schmiedel et al. [37]	ENB	OXA-48	NR	Investigation (search)
	Ewers et al. [55]	GNFB	OXA-23	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Ewers et al. [57]	GNFB	OXA-23	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Klotz et al. [63]	GNFB	OXA-58	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Spain	Gonzalez-Torralba et al. [33]	ENB	VIM-1	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Finland	Gronthal et al. [34]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report and search)
France	Valat et al. [23]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Melo et al. [48]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Herivaux et al. [56]	GNFB	OXA-23	NR	Investigation (search)
	Lupo et al. [64]	GNFB	OXA-23	Chromosome	Surveillance
Italy	Alba et al. [49]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Italy	Gentilini et al. [59]	GNFB	NDM-1, OXA-23, L1^b), LP	NR	Investigation (search)
Portugal	Brilhante et al. [26]	ENB	OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Portugal	Pomba et al. [58]	GNFB	OXA-23	Chromosome	Investigation (report)
United Kingdom	Reynolds et al. [24]	ENB	NDM-5	Plasmid	Surveillance
Serbia	Misic et al. [62]	GNFB	OXA-72	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Switzerland	Nigg et al. [20]	ENB	OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Brilhante et al. [38]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Dazio et al. [40]	ENB	NDM-5, OXA-48, OXA-181	NR	Investigation (search)
	Peterhans et al. [43]	ENB	NDM- 5	Plasmid	Investigation (NR)
Algeria	Yousfi et al. [27]	ENB	OXA-48, NDM-5	NR	Investigation (search)
	Yousfi et al. [28]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Mairi et al. [30]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Egypt	Khalifa et al. [44]	ENB	VIM-4, OXA-48, OXA-244	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Australia	Abraham et al. [35]	ENB	IMP-4	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
Context associated with companion animals^c)
Brazil	Fernandes et al. [54]	GNFB	VIM-2	Chromosome	Investigation (report and search)
Egypt	Ramadan et al. [51]	ENB	NDM-5, OXA-181	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
Switzerland	Brilhante et al. [38]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (report)
	Seiffert et al. [50]	ENB	OXA-48	Plasmid	Investigation (search)
	Schmidt et al. [52]	ENB	OXA-48, OXA-181	NR	Investigation (search)

Study	Sample origin			Antimicrobial use		Carbapenem resistance
Study	Animal	n	Specimen	Carbapenem	Others	Bacterial species	CR origin^a)
Li et al. [19]	Dogs	2	Stool	NR	NR	Escherichia coli	NDM-5
Nigg et al. [20]	Dogs, cats	21	Rectal swab	NO	PEN, BET/INHIB, QUIN, NIT, CEP, TET, SUL	E. coli	OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Wang et al. [21]	Dogs, cats	6	Stool, urine	NR	NR	E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii	NDM-5
Hong et al. [22]	Dogs, cats	2	Rectal swab	MERO	QUIN, CEP, TET	E. coli	NDM-5
Valat et al. [23]	Dogs	1	NR	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Reynolds et al. [24]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NO	BET/INHIB, CEP, TET, QUIN	E. coli	NDM-5
Pulss et al. [25]	Dogs, cats	130	CVADs^c), urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NO	CEP 2°, 3°, PEN, QUIN, BET/INHB	Klebsiella pneumoniae/Klebsiella oxytoca, E. cloacae, E. coli	OXA-48
Brilhante et al. [26]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Yousfi et al. [27]	Dogs, cats	5	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48, NDM-5
Yousfi et al. [28]	Dogs, cats	6	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae	OXA-48
Stolle et al. [29]	Dogs	6	CVADs^c), tissues^b), stool, urine, other fluids^d)	NO	PEN, BET/INHIB, QUIN, CEP, 3° TET	K. pneumoniae, E. coli	OXA-48
Mairi et al. [30]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Cui et al. [31]	Dogs	1	Anal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Hong et al. [32]	Dogs	4	Rectal swab	MERO	CEP 1°, QUIN, BET/INHIB, NIT	E. coli	NDM-5
Gonzalez-Torralba et al.[33]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NO	NO	K. pneumoniae	VIM-1
Gronthal et al. [34]	Dogs	2	Ear swab	NO	QUIN, CEP 1°, BET/INHIB, LIN	E. coli	NDM-5
Abraham et al. [35]	Cats	4	Stool	NO	TET	Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium	IMP-4
Liu et al. [36]	Dogs, cats	NR	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Schmiedel et al. [37]	Dogs, cats	NR	NR	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae	OXA-48
Brilhante et al. [38]	Dogs, cats	10	Urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Liu et al. [39]	Dogs	NR	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	OXA-48
Dazio et al. [40]	Dogs, cats	25	Rectal swab	NO	NR	E. coli	NDM-5, OXA-48, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Dazio et al. [40]	Dogs, cats	25	Rectal swab	NO	NR	K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Daniels et al. [41]	Dogs	2	Urine, tissues^b)	NO	TET	Enterobacter. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis	KPC-4
Sellera et al. [42]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	K. pneumoniae	KPC-2
Peterhans et al. [43]	Dogs	1	Tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Khalifa et al. [44]	Dogs, cats	7	Nasal swab, eye swab	NR	NR	E. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis	VIM-4
						K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
						E. coli	OXA-244 (OXA-48-like)
Hong et al. [45]	Dogs	4	Rectal swab	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Pruthvishree et al. [46]	Dogs	1	Other fluids^d)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Shaheen et al. [47]	Dogs, cats	6	Urine, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-1
Melo et al. [48]	Dogs	1	Rectal swab	NO	BET/INHIB	E. coli	OXA-48
Alba et al. [49]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Wang et al. [53]	Dogs	1	Anal swab	NR	NR	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	IMP-45
Fernandes et al. [54]	Dogs	1	Oral swab, rectal swab, other fluids^d)	NR	NR	P. aeruginosa	VIM-2
Ewers et al. [55]	Dogs, cats	3	Vaginal swab, urine, other fluids^d)	NR	NR	Acinetobacter baumannii	OXA-23
Herivaux et al. [56]	Dogs	2	Oral swab, rectal swab	NO	NO	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Ewers et al. [57]	Cats	1	Urine	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Pomba et al. [58]	Cats	1	Urine	NO	BET/INHB	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Gentilini et al. [59]	Dogs, cats	11	Rectal swab	NO	BET/INHIB, TET, QUIN, NIT	A. radioresistens	NDM-1
						A. baumannii	OXA-23
						P. aeruginosa	Loss of porin^e)
						Stenotrophomonas maltophilia	L1^f)
Tyson et al. [60]	Dogs	1	Other fluids^d)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Hyun et al. [61]	Dogs	10	Other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	P. aeruginosa	VIM- 2
Misic et al. [62]	Dogs	1	Urine	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-72 (OXA-40-like)
Klotz et al. [63]	Dogs, cats	4	Nasal swab, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NR	NR	Acinetobacter pittii	OXA-58 (OXA-58-like)
Lupo et al. [64]	Dogs, cats	7	NR	NR	NR	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Kimura et al. [65]	Dogs, cats	2	Urine, other fluids^d)	NO	PHOS	A. radioresistens	IMP-1
Taj et al. [66]	Cats	1	Urine	NO	BET/ INHIB, QUIN	A. baumannii	OXA-23
Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	Dogs	16	Rectal swab, vaginal swab, tissues^b)	NR	NR	E. coli	NDM-5
Oh et al. [68]	Dogs	4	Stool, nasal swab, urine	MERO	BET/ INHIB, TET	E. coli	NDM-5
Cole et al. [69]	Dogs, cats	6	Urine, other fluids^d), tissues^b)	NO	PEN, CEP, AMN, NIT, BET/ INHIB	E. coli	NDM-5
Brilhante et al. [38]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
Seiffert et al. [50]	Pet food^g)	NA	Pet food packages	NA		Enterobacterales (undetermined species)	OXA-48
Ramadan et al. [51]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		E. coli	NDM-5, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
Schmidt et al. [52]	Veterinary surfaces	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		E. coli	OXA-48, OXA-181 (OXA-48-like)
						K. pneumoniae	OXA-48
						E. cloacae	OXA-48
Fernandes et al. [54]	Household surfaces^h)	NA	Environmental swabs	NA		P. aeruginosa	VIM-2

First author	Country	Isolation place	Sampled animals (n)			Animals with CR microorganisms (n)			Frequency of animals with CR (%)
First author	Country	Isolation place	Dogs	Cats	Total	Dogs	Cats	Total	Dogs	Cats	Total
Li et al. [19]	China	Households with backyard pig farms	92	19	111	2	0	2	2.17	0.00	1.80
Nigg et al. [20]	Switzerland	University veterinary hospital	76	21	97	17	4	21	22.37	19.05	21.65
Reynolds et al. [24]	United Kingdom	Veterinary clinics	158	27	185	1	0	1	0.63	0.00	0.54
Pulss et al. [25]	Germany	Veterinary microbiology laboratory	3,375	932	4,307	117	13	130	3.47	1.39	3.02
Brilhante et al. [26]	Portugal	Homes and university veterinary hospital	71	27	98	1	0	1	1.41	0.00	1.02
Yousfi et al. [27]	Algeria	Local veterinary office	116	84	200	3	2	5	2.59	2.38	2.50
Yousfi et al. [28]	Algeria	Local veterinary office and homes	265	49	314	4	2	6	1.51	4.08	1.91
Mairi et al. [30]	Algeria	NR	75	37	112	1	0	1	1.33	0.00	0.89
Cui et al. [31]	China	University veterinary hospital	NR	NR	226	1	0	1	NA	NA	0.44
Hong et al. [32]	South Korea	Veterinary clinics	353	0	353	4	0	4	1.13	0.00	1.13
Gonzalez-Torralba et al. [33]	Spain	Companion animal shelter	160	0	160	1	0	1	0.63	0.00	0.63
Khalifa et al. [44]	Egypt	NR	NR	NR	1,348	3	4	7	NA	NA	0.52
Hong et al. [45]	South Korea	Veterinary hospitals	315	74	389	4	0	4	1.27	0.00	1.03
Melo et al. [48]	France	University veterinary hospital	166	227	393	1	0	1	0.60	0.00	0.25
Bandyopadhyay et al. [67]	India	Veterinary clinics and university veterinary hospital	237	0	237	16	0	16	6.75	0.00	6.75
Herivaux et al. [56]	France	University veterinary hospital	104	46	150	2	0	2	1.92	0.00	1.33
Gentilini et al. [59]	Italy	Veterinary hospitals and homes	134	72	206	8	3	11	5.97	4.17	5.34
Hyun et al. [61]	South Korea	Veterinary medical teaching hospital	80	0	80	10	0	10	12.5	0.00	12.50
Klotz et al. [63]	Germany	Veterinary clinics	110	48	158	2	2	4	1.82	4.17	2.53

Table 1. Geographical distribution of CR isolates obtained from canines and felines, their settings, and the study type

Carbapenemase production or loss of porins.

Intrinsic metallo-β-lactamase L1 of the species Stenotrophomonas maltophilia encoded by chromosomes.

Veterinary medical care surfaces, household surfaces, and companion animal food.

Table 2. CR in microorganisms isolated from canine and feline samples and their history of antimicrobial use

Referred to the mechanism that confers resistance to the microorganism: production of carbapenemases or loss of the bacterial target.

Included wound tissues, nasal structure, skin, abdominal cavity, anal sacs, intestine, and lung.

Included central venous catheters.

Included bronchoalveolar and tracheobronchial lavage, scrotal fluid, pus, bile, ear discharge, and eye discharge.

The authors determined that the loss of the oprD porin was caused by different mutations within the gene that caused a premature stop codon because of a large insertion, a frameshift, or a nonsense mutation.

Chromosome-encoded intrinsic metallo-β-lactamase L1 of S. maltophilia species.

Mixed wet pet food with different flavors.

Home surfaces (sofa, balcony, water cooler).

Table 3. Frequency of animals with CR isolates

CR, carbapenem resistant; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.

Articles

Page Path

Carbapenem resistance in critically important human pathogens isolated from companion animals: a systematic literature review

Full Article

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Search Strategy and Selection of Studies

Data Extraction and Processing

Results

Study Characterization

Animal Clinical History

CR Bacteria Isolated from Domestic Canines and Felines

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Evaluation

CR Genotypic Detection

Geographical Distribution of CR Bacteria

Multilocus STs in CR Bacteria

CR Isolations from Companion Animals Related to Humans and Other Animal Species

Discussion

Conclusion

Supplementary Material

Table S1.

Table S2.

Table S3.

Table S4.

Article information

References

Figure & Data

References

Citations

CITE

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Figure

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

About

Browse articles

Editorial policies

For authors