Figure 1
Forest plot showing the association of the fecal carriage of ESBL-EC with epidemiological variables.
The values of Cramer’s V confirmed a relatively strong effect size (0.447) of the variable ≥ 2.5 years – ≤5 years, and a moderate effect (0.367) of the variable “food ingestion of animal origin.”
Figure 2
Hierarchical clustering dendogram demonstrating phylogenetic and resistance profiling of ESBL-EC.
Analysis based on clinical, epidemiological and molecular characteristics identified 2 distinct clusters of child fecal carriage of ESBL-EC. Note the presence of 2 subgroups (major cluster) with similar relationships of 100%. Children with a lower degree of similarity (≤65%) were observed in the minor cluster.
AMK: amikacin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; GEM: gentamicin; N°: children (ESBL-EC positive); NAL: nalidixic acid; PG: phylogenetic group; Rest. Profile: resistance profile.
Table 1Demographic and epidemiological characteristics associated with ESBL-producing E. coli from healthy children from a rural Andean village in Venezuela.
Characteristics |
Detection of ESBL n (%) |
Multivariate OR (95% CI) |
p
|
Positive 27 (34.6) |
Negative 51 (65.4) |
Gender
|
|
Male |
14 (51.9) |
28 (54.9) |
1 |
|
|
Female |
13 (48.1) |
23 (45.1) |
1.130 (0.444–2.880) |
0.9853 |
|
Age
|
|
1 – ≤ 2.5 |
7 (25.9) |
37 (72.6) |
1 |
|
|
≥ 2.5 – ≤5 |
20 (74.1) |
14 (27.4) |
7.551 (2.621–21.754) |
0.0002 |
|
Variety of food in weekly diet
|
|
Still breast-feeding |
6 (22.2) |
31 (60.8) |
|
|
|
Two or more different type of animal-origin food |
21 (77.8) |
20 (39.2) |
5.425 (1.865–15.778) |
0.0026 |
|
Hygiene habit (hand washing)
|
|
Water |
5 (18.5) |
22 (43.1) |
1 |
|
|
Water and soap |
22 (81.5) |
29 (56.9) |
3.338 (1.091–10.213) |
0.0543 |
|
Household crowding
|
|
No |
9 (33.3) |
23 (45.1) |
|
|
|
Yes |
18 (66.7) |
28 (54.9) |
0.609 (0.230–1.609) |
0.4455 |
|
Hospital admission in the last year
|
|
No |
22 (81.5) |
46 (90.2) |
1 |
|
|
Yes |
5 (18.5) |
5 (9.8) |
2.091 (0.548–7.985) |
0.4597 |
|
Antibiotic consumption within the last 3 months
|
|
No |
22 (81.5) |
50 (98.0) |
1 |
|
|
Yes |
5 (18.5) |
1 (2.0) |
11.364 (1.252–103.11) |
0.0304 |
Table 2Antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli strains isolated from healthy children from a rural Andean village in Venezuela.
Antibiotic |
MIC Range (μg/ml) |
Antimicrobial susceptibility n (%) |
Susceptible |
Intermediate |
Resistant |
Ampicillin/sulbactam |
≤8/4 – ≥32/16 |
77 (98.7) |
- |
1 (1.3) |
Piperacillin/tazobactam |
≤16/4 – ≥128/4 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Cefoxitin |
≤8 – ≥32 |
73 (93.6) |
- |
5 (6.4) |
Ceftazidime |
≤4 – ≥16 |
52 (66.7) |
- |
26 (33.3) |
Cefotaxime |
≤1 – ≥4 |
51 (65.4) |
- |
27 (34.6) |
Cefepime |
≤2 – ≥16 |
60 (72.9) |
- |
18 (23.1) |
Aztreonam |
≤4 – ≥16 |
52 (66.7) |
- |
26 (33.3) |
Ertapenem |
≤0,5 – ≥32 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Imipenem |
≤1 – ≥4 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Meropenem |
≤1 – ≥4 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Amikacin |
≤16 – ≥64 |
71 (91.0) |
2 (2.6) |
5 (6.4) |
Gentamicin |
≤4 – ≥16 |
72 (92.3) |
- |
6 (7.7) |
Nalidixic acid |
≤16 – ≥32 |
72 (92.3) |
2 (2.6) |
4 (5.1) |
Ciprofloxacin |
≤0,06– ≥1 |
71 (91.0) |
3 (3.8) |
4 (5.1) |
Tigecycline |
≤0,1 – ≥16 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Colistin |
≤0,5 – ≥64 |
78 (100) |
- |
0 (0.0) |
Table 3Susceptibility profile of E. coli strains isolated from healthy children from a rural Andean village in Venezuela.
Susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli n=78 |
ESBL n= 27 (34.6%) |
n° (%) |
non-ESBL n= 51 (65.4%) |
n° (%) |
ESBL + |
17 (63.0) |
Susceptible |
44 (86.3) |
ESBL + GEMR
|
2 (7.4) |
AMKI
|
2 (3.9) |
ESBL + NALR
|
2 (7.4) |
CIPI
|
2 (3.9) |
ESBL + AMKR
|
1 (3.7) |
NALI
|
1(2.0) |
ESBL + NALR + CIPR
|
1 (3.7) |
NALR
|
1(2.0) |
ESBL + AMKR + GEMR
|
1 (3.7) |
NALI + CIPI
|
1(2.0) |
ESBL + AMKR + GEMR + CIPR
|
3 (11.1) |
|
|
Total |
27 (100) |
Total |
51 (100) |
Table 4Distribution of blaESBLs genes according to the phylogenetic group of E. coli strains.
Gene blaESBLs
|
Phylogenetic group n = 27 |
Total |
A |
B1 |
B2 |
D |
n (%) |
blaCTX-M-15
|
9 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
19 (70.4) |
blaCTX-M-15 + blaTEM-1
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 (11.1) |
blaCTX-M-15 + blaTEM-5
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 (7.4) |
blaCTX-M-15 + blaSHV-5
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 (7.4) |
blaCTX-M-15 + blaSHV-12
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (3.7) |
Total (%) |
14 (51.9) |
3 (11.1) |
8(29.6) |
2 (7.4) |
27 (100) |