Skip to contents Skip to Global Navigation Menu
  • KDCA
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives

OPEN ACCESS. pISSN: 2210-9099. eISSN: 2233-6052

Page Path

1
results for

"Least-squares analysis"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Least-squares analysis"

Original Article
Time-series comparison of COVID-19 case fatality rates across 21 countries with adjustment for multiple covariates
Yongmoon Kim, Bryan Inho Kim, Sangwoo Tak
Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2022;13(6):424-434.
Published online November 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2022.0212
Time-series comparison of COVID-19 case fatality rates across 21 countries with adjustment for multiple covariates
Objectives
Although it is widely used as a measure for mortality, the case fatality rate (CFR) ofcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can vary over time and fluctuate for many reasons otherthan viral characteristics. To compare the CFRs of different countries in equal measure, weestimated comparable CFRs after adjusting for multiple covariates and examined the mainfactors that contributed to variability in the CFRs among 21 countries.Methods: For statistical analysis, time-series cross-sectional data were collected from OurWorld in Data, CoVariants.org, and GISAID. Biweekly CFRs of COVID-19 were estimated bypooled generalized linear squares regression models for the panel data. Covariates includedthe predominant virus variant, reproduction rate, vaccination, national economic status,hospital beds, diabetes prevalence, and population share of individuals older than age 65. Intotal, 21 countries were eligible for analysis.Results: Adjustment for covariates reduced variation in the CFRs of COVID-19 across countriesand over time. Regression results showed that the dominant spread of the Omicron variant,reproduction rate, and vaccination were associated with lower country-level CFRs, whereasage, the extreme poverty rate, and diabetes prevalence were associated with higher countrylevel CFRs.Conclusion: A direct comparison of crude CFRs among countries may be fallacious, especiallyin a cross-sectional analysis. Our study presents an adjusted comparison of CFRs over timefor a more proper comparison. In addition, our findings suggest that comparing CFRs amongdifferent countries without considering their context, such as the epidemic phase, medicalcapacity, surveillance strategy, and socio-demographic traits, should be avoided.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Socioeconomic determinants of COVID-19 vaccination and mortality: a cross-national path analysis
    Fulya Ipek-Erdem, Esra Erpek, Volkan Genç, Aybars Bars, Sabri Erdem, Servet Akar
    BMC Public Health.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From mono to multi-causality: Towards a comprehensive perspective on understanding death
    Peter Harteloh
    Health Policy.2024; 147: 105121.     CrossRef
  • Comments on the article "Time-series comparison of COVID-19 case fatality rates across 21 countries with adjustment for multiple covariates"
    Gaetano Perone
    Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives.2023; 14(2): 146.     CrossRef
  • 11,035 View
  • 151 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • Crossref
Page of 1