Skip to contents Skip to Global Navigation Menu
  • KDCA
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission

PHRP : Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives

OPEN ACCESS. pISSN: 2210-9099. eISSN: 2233-6052
Review Article

Systematic review of emerging environmental contaminants: sources, environmental fate, and impacts


Published online: July 28, 2026

1Chemistry Unit of Mathematics Programme, National Mathematical Centre, Abuja, Nigeria

2Biology Unit of Mathematics Programme, National Mathematical Centre, Abuja, Nigeria

3Chemistry Department, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria

4Industrial Chemistry Department, Edo State University, Iyamho, Nigeria

5Biochemical and Chemical Sciences Department, Federal Polytechnic Offa, Offa, Nigeria

Corresponding author: Abdulwasiu Olawale Salaudeen Chemistry Unit of Mathematics Programme, National Mathematical Centre, PMB 118 Sheda-Kwali, Abuja, Nigeria E-mail: greenplanet5050@gmail.com
• Received: January 21, 2026   • Revised: May 21, 2026   • Accepted: May 27, 2026

© 2026 Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

  • 2,194 Views
  • 97 Download
  • 1 Crossref
  • Objectives
    This review aimed to synthesize recent advances in the understanding of emerging contaminants (ECs), including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, microplastics and nanoplastics, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and engineered nanomaterials. It critically assessed their sources, environmental pathways, transformation mechanisms, and ecological and human health impacts, while identifying knowledge gaps and future research priorities.
  • Methods
    A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. Peer-reviewed research articles and critical reviews were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Emphasis was placed on studies that used advanced analytical techniques, including high-resolution mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and biosensor-based detection methods.
  • Results
    The findings indicated that ECs are characterized by high environmental persistence, complex transformation pathways, bioaccumulation, and trophic transfer potential. Reported impacts included endocrine disruption, genotoxicity, antimicrobial resistance, and ecological imbalance. Across global environmental compartments, these pollutants pose long-term risks to ecosystems and human health. Their distinctive partitioning behavior and environmental persistence challenge standard ecological assessment frameworks and underscore the need for comprehensive toxicological evaluations and robust regulatory oversight to mitigate long-term biological accumulation and adverse physiological effects in aquatic and terrestrial wildlife.
  • Conclusion
    This review highlights the urgent need for improved regulatory frameworks, standardized monitoring approaches, and sustainable remediation strategies for ECs. By integrating advanced analytical methods, computational tools, and circular economy principles, the review provides a timely contribution to environmental science and policy and supports informed decision-making for environmental protection and public health.
Rapid industrialization, urbanization, and globalized consumption have introduced a suite of pollutants increasingly recognized as emerging contaminants (ECs). Unlike conventional pollutants, such as heavy metals or legacy pesticides, ECs are characterized by relatively recent recognition, incomplete regulatory coverage, and limited understanding of long-term environmental and health effects [1]. Their chemical diversity includes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are widely used in firefighting foams and nonstick coatings; pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs); microplastics and nanoplastics; endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs); and engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). These contaminants pose a profound and multifaceted challenge to environmental management due to their persistence, toxicity, and mobility across environmental compartments [2–6].
Global attention has shifted toward ECs because of mounting evidence of their ubiquity and adverse effects. For example, PFAS, often termed “forever chemicals,” resist degradation and have been detected in surface water, groundwater, soil, and human blood serum, often at trace concentrations [7–9]. Similarly, microplastics and nanoplastics have been identified in remote regions, including Arctic ice cores, illustrating their potential for long-range atmospheric transport [10–12]. Pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics and antidepressants, enter aquatic systems largely through wastewater effluents, where they may increase antimicrobial resistance or disrupt the behavior and physiology of aquatic organisms [13,14]. Endocrine disruptors, such as bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, are linked to reproductive disorders, developmental anomalies, and hormonal imbalances in humans and wildlife [15,16].
The mechanisms through which ECs exert ecological and health effects are complex and often compound-specific. Persistence and bioaccumulation are recurring characteristics, with many ECs exhibiting hydrophobicity that facilitates partitioning into sediments or biological tissues. Some ECs, such as PFAS, contain both hydrophilic and hydrophobic functional groups, enabling unusual environmental behavior, including mobility through groundwater systems while bioaccumulating in organisms [17,18]. Nanomaterials present distinct challenges because their small size, high surface-area-to-volume ratio, and reactivity enable interactions at cellular and subcellular levels, potentially inducing oxidative stress, genotoxicity, or immunological responses [19,20].
The effects of ECs extend beyond toxicological outcomes to broader ecological and societal concerns. Antibiotics in aquatic ecosystems may accelerate the spread of antimicrobial resistance, a global health emergency, while microplastics can disrupt trophic chains and may act as vectors for other contaminants [21,22]. Environmental contamination by ECs also has direct socioeconomic implications, including increased drinking water treatment costs, loss of ecosystem services, and erosion of public trust in environmental safety [23].
Accordingly, a review of ECs is both timely and necessary. Existing reviews often focus on specific contaminant classes, yet few comprehensively integrate evidence across pollutant types, detection technologies, mechanistic understanding, health and ecological effects, and remediation strategies. This review aimed to synthesize the recent evidence and provide a critical, holistic assessment of ECs as pollutants of major concern. Through this synthesis, we aimed to identify key pollutants and knowledge gaps while proposing future directions aligned with global sustainability goals and circular economy principles.
This review aligned with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and rigor. Literature searches were performed in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, primarily targeting records published from 2020 through 2025. Search strings included combinations of keywords such as “emerging contaminants,” “PFAS,” “pharmaceuticals,” “personal care products,” “microplastics,” “nanoplastics,” “endocrine disruptors,” “nanomaterials,” “mechanistic insights,” and “environmental impact.” Boolean operators were used to refine the search results.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) peer-reviewed articles or critical reviews published between 2020 and 2025, with 13 exceptions when suitable more recent references were unavailable (1 article each from 2003, 2011, 2013, 2016, 2017, and 2018; 2 articles each from 2014 and 2015; and 3 articles from 2019); (2) studies reporting on at least 1 major class of ECs; (3) studies focusing on sources, detection or quantification, mechanisms, impacts, or remediation; and (4) studies providing sufficient methodological detail or quantitative results. The exclusion criteria were gray literature, conference abstracts without full text, and studies lacking methodological transparency.
The initial search yielded approximately 1,143 records, including 1,059 from databases and 84 from other sources. After duplicate removal and title and abstract screening, 408 articles were shortlisted for full-text review. Following a detailed eligibility assessment, 245 articles were included in the final synthesis. Study identification, screening, exclusion, and inclusion are summarized in the PRISMA workflow shown in Figure 1. Data were extracted using a standardized template that captured pollutant class, study location, detection or quantification method, key findings, and proposed remediation approaches.
This approach provides a broadly representative synthesis of current global research on ECs, emphasizing peer-reviewed, high-quality studies. Integrating evidence across diverse pollutant classes enabled a holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with addressing environmental pollution from ECs.
ECs originate from a broad array of anthropogenic activities and enter environmental compartments through complex pathways. Figure 2 summarizes the major inputs and interconnected transport routes through which ECs enter and move across environmental compartments. Unlike conventional pollutants, such as heavy metals or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), ECs often lack direct discharge permits or monitoring frameworks, complicating efforts to identify and regulate their sources. Major contributors include industrial discharges, municipal wastewater effluents, agricultural practices, and improper disposal of household products. Wastewater treatment plants frequently represent critical nodes in EC dissemination because they function both as collection points for diverse pollutants and as incomplete barriers, since many ECs are only partially removed by conventional treatment processes [24,25].
Industrial sources contribute substantially to the environmental burden of ECs. PFAS are widely used in the production of water-repellent textiles, nonstick cookware, and firefighting foams, and they may be released into the environment during both manufacturing and product use [26]. Pharmaceutical production facilities are also hotspots for localized contamination, with antibiotic residues often exceeding ecotoxicological thresholds in effluents [27]. Agricultural practices contribute pesticides, veterinary antibiotics, and growth hormones, whereas landfill leachate serves as a reservoir for diverse ECs, including microplastics and bisphenols [28,29].
The pathways by which ECs enter environmental compartments are similarly diverse. Surface waters receive inputs through direct discharges, stormwater runoff, and atmospheric deposition. Groundwater contamination occurs primarily through leaching, particularly for mobile ECs such as PFAS, whose amphiphilic nature enables transport through soil matrices. The atmosphere also acts as a vector: volatile and semi-volatile ECs can undergo long-range transport before deposition, helping explain the detection of PFAS and microplastics in remote polar regions [30,31]. Biota may also serve as conduits when aquatic organisms ingest microplastics or bioaccumulate lipophilic compounds, facilitating trophic transfer.
PFAS
PFAS are among the most scrutinized ECs due to their chemical persistence and global distribution. As of 2025, more than 12,000 PFAS have been identified, although only a small fraction are routinely monitored [17,32,33]. PFAS are a class of anthropogenic “forever chemicals” characterized by exceptionally strong carbon–fluorine bonds (~485–540 kJ/mol), which confer thermal and chemical stability and make these compounds highly resistant to conventional hydrolytic and photolytic degradation [34]. Mechanistically, their environmental behavior is governed by their amphiphilic structure, which consists of a perfluorinated tail and a polar functional head group, such as a carboxylate or sulfonate group [35,36]. Along with well-known compounds such as perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), short-chain PFAS (e.g., perfluorobutanesulfonic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid) and fluoropolymer degradation products have gained attention due to their increasing detection in environmental matrices [37–39]. Short-chain PFAS were initially promoted as safer alternatives; however, recent toxicological evidence suggests that they are highly mobile and can contaminate groundwater because of reduced sorption to soil [17,40,41]. In surface water and groundwater, PFAS partitioning is influenced by chain length and functional group chemistry. Long-chain PFAS exhibit greater interfacial activity and sorption affinity, driven by fluorinated chain interactions and electrostatic forces; short-chain analogues are more mobile because of their lower organic carbon–water partition coefficients (Koc), facilitating their persistence and transport in groundwater plumes [42,43].
Recent global assessments have reported PFAS concentrations in surface waters exceeding 100 ng/L near industrialized regions, whereas detectable levels in remote areas, including the Arctic, support atmospheric and oceanic transport [44–46]. The global detection of PFAS in diverse aquatic matrices reflects complex transport and sequestration mechanisms. In surface waters, case studies have identified wastewater treatment plants as major mechanistic sources. Lenka et al. [47] and Mustafa et al. [48] demonstrated that although conventional secondary treatment effectively removes legacy surfactants, it can act as a “precursor processor” for PFAS: polyfluorinated precursors undergo oxidative transformation into highly persistent perfluorinated carboxylic acids, yielding higher effluent concentrations than influent loads.
In groundwater systems, the mechanistic focus shifts to the air–water interface within the vadose zone. Brusseau and Van Glubt [49] and subsequent North American field studies have shown that PFAS accumulation at this interface substantially slows the downward migration of long-chain compounds such as PFOS. Conversely, short-chain variants (e.g., perfluorobutanoic acid) exhibit breakthrough behavior because of minimal interfacial affinity, producing extensive contamination plumes that can travel kilometers from aqueous film-forming foam training sites. At the sediment–water interface, sorption is governed by organic carbon content, mineral surface properties, and solution chemistry. Multivalent cations, such as Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, can mediate cation bridging between anionic PFAS headgroups and negatively charged sediment surfaces, thereby enhancing retention under specific geochemical conditions [50,51]. In sediment and biota, Gao et al. [52] described the mechanistic trapping of PFAS in urban estuaries. Salinity gradients trigger salting-out effects, reducing PFAS solubility and promoting adsorption onto suspended organic matter, which then settles into the benthic zone.
This dual behavior helps explain the distinctive mobility and high bioaccumulation potential of PFAS. In aquatic biota, PFAS deviate from classical hydrophobic partitioning behavior and instead show strong protein affinity, binding preferentially to serum albumin and fatty acid-binding proteins [53]. This proteinophilic behavior promotes bioaccumulation in blood-rich tissues, including the liver and plasma, driving trophic transfer and biomagnification in aquatic food webs [54,55]. PFAS exposure is associated with thyroid dysfunction, immune suppression (including reduced vaccine response), and developmental effects in children [56–58]. Studies of apex predators in the Great Lakes suggest that bioaccumulation is driven by hepatic sequestration. Unlike traditional PCBs, which are stored in adipose tissue, PFAS bind to the ligand-binding domain of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), helping explain their high concentrations in the liver and blood of teleost fish and marine mammals [52].
Recent studies have reported PFAS in drinking water supplies at concentrations exceeding provisional health advisory limits, raising urgent public health concerns [59–61].
The persistence of PFAS stems from the high energy of the carbon–fluorine bond (485–540 kJ/mol), which resists hydrolysis, photolysis, and microbial degradation. This durability has prompted the widespread description of PFAS as “forever chemicals.” Reported toxicological effects include hepatotoxicity, immunotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and potential carcinogenicity [62–65]. Mechanistically, PFAS disrupt lipid metabolism, hormone regulation, and immune responses, although precise dose–response relationships remain under investigation [66,67].
A consolidated summary of recent PFAS investigations, including concentration ranges, environmental matrices, and analytical techniques, is presented in Table 1 [68–73].
PPCPs
PPCPs are considered pseudo-persistent pollutants. Although many degrade relatively quickly compared with PFAS, their continuous introduction into wastewater creates a steady-state environmental presence. This heterogeneous group includes antibiotics, analgesics, antidepressants, hormones, sunscreens, and fragrances. Physicochemically, PPCPs constitute a structurally diverse class of ECs whose environmental behavior is shaped by their ionization constants (pKa), octanol–water partition coefficients (logKow), and functional group reactivity [74]. Unlike legacy hydrophobic pollutants, many PPCPs are polar or ionizable; therefore, their speciation in aquatic systems is highly sensitive to ambient pH [75]. They enter the environment primarily through wastewater effluents, with human and veterinary excretion accounting for most residues. Many pharmaceuticals are only partially metabolized in the human body, and unmetabolized fractions pass into sewage systems [76–78]. In surface waters, case studies frequently identify wastewater treatment plants as pseudo-persistent sources. Wilkinson et al. [79] conducted a global survey of 258 rivers, revealing that the prevalence of carbamazepine and metformin stems from their high resistance to microbial metabolic pathways during activated sludge processes. Mechanistically, the tricyclic structure of carbamazepine limits its bioavailability to degrading enzymes; thus, it serves as a conservative tracer of anthropogenic influence in aquatic systems.
In surface waters, the fate of PPCPs is governed primarily by competition between photodegradation and microbial transformation [80,81]. Compounds with chromophores, such as sulfamethoxazole and diclofenac, undergo direct photolysis or indirect transformation through reactions with photochemically produced reactive intermediates, including hydroxyl radicals and singlet oxygen [82,83].
Antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline are of particular concern because of their association with antimicrobial resistance [84–86]. A global ecological analysis showed a positive correlation between national median ciprofloxacin concentrations in rivers and the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli, suggesting that even relatively low environmental ciprofloxacin levels may contribute to selection for antimicrobial resistance [87].
Beyond surface waters, these contaminants can be transported into groundwater, where their movement results primarily from advection–dispersion coupled with attenuated sorption. For cationic pharmaceuticals, such as beta-blockers, sorption to aquifer materials is dominated by cation exchange and electrostatic attraction to negatively charged clay minerals and metal oxides [88]. Conversely, neutral compounds partition through hydrophobic interactions with natural organic matter (NOM) [80,81]. Recent research further indicates that the presence of sulfonamide antibiotics in groundwater is governed by competitive adsorption [80,89]. In aquifers with high organic matter content, sulfonamides compete for limited adsorption sites on soil surfaces through interactions such as π–π electron donor–acceptor interactions and hydrogen bonding [89]. However, as pH increases beyond their pKa values, typically pKa2 for the sulfonamide group moiety, sulfonamides such as sulfamethoxazole deprotonate into anionic forms [90]. This shift leads to electrostatic repulsion from predominantly negatively charged mineral surfaces and NOM [90,91]. Consequently, this mechanism enhances vertical mobility through the soil profile and substantially increases the risk of groundwater contamination [92,93].
Non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals also disrupt ecological function. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as diclofenac, persist in aquatic systems and are toxic to fish and vultures, causing renal failure and population declines [94–96]. The sediment–water interface serves as a critical mechanistic sink for hydrophobic PPCPs, such as synthetic musks and triclosan, and for compounds capable of forming strong hydrogen bonds or surface complexes [97]. In the benthic zone, these compounds may undergo anaerobic degradation or become sequestered through aging processes, in which they migrate into the internal micropores of sediment particles, reducing their bioavailability [97]. However, sediment-bound triclosan can provide a mechanistic reservoir; research indicates that benthic organisms can trigger remobilization of these contaminants through bioturbation, which alters local redox potential and releases sequestered compounds back into the water column [98].
Sunscreen agents, such as oxybenzone and octocrylene, accumulate in coral reefs and may contribute to bleaching events [99]. Among personal care products, parabens and synthetic musks are widely detected in surface waters and sediments [76]. Their lipophilic properties facilitate accumulation in aquatic organisms, with recent biomonitoring studies confirming their presence in fish tissues from urban rivers [100]. In aquatic biota, PPCP bioaccumulation differs from the lipid-driven partitioning typical of persistent organic pollutants [75]. Because many pharmaceuticals are designed to interact with specific biological targets, such as enzymes or receptors, their uptake is often mediated by active transport proteins or pH-dependent passive diffusion across gill membranes. For example, investigations in the Puget Sound estuary indicated that accumulation of the antidepressant fluoxetine in fish tissue is driven by pH-dependent membrane partitioning. Since many PPCPs are weak bases, they exist in nonionized form at specific physiological pH levels, facilitating passive diffusion across the gill lipid bilayer. Inside the organism, they become ion-trapped in more acidic lysosomes [101].
Once internalized, PPCPs undergo phase I metabolism, mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes, and phase II metabolism, involving conjugation [74,102]. Biodegradation can partially remove PPCPs; however, transformation products may be more toxic than the parent compounds. For example, carbamazepine metabolites have shown greater genotoxicity than the original drug [103,104]. This finding underscores the need for whole-mixture toxicity assessment rather than narrow assessment of parent PPCPs alone [78]. The continuous pseudo-persistence of PPCPs in water leads to chronic exposure and non-target effects, including endocrine disruption and antidepressant-related alterations in fish behavior, even at ng/L concentrations [105].
Among PPCPs, antibiotics are particularly concerning due to their role in fostering antimicrobial resistance. A recent global survey identified rivers in some countries with antibiotic levels exceeding safe ecological thresholds [21,106].
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Microplastics (<5 mm) and nanoplastics (<1 μm) are increasingly recognized as pervasive environmental pollutants, reported in air, water, soil, food, and human blood [107–110]. A 2024 study quantified microplastics and nanoplastics in human blood using pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py–GC/MS) and detected plastic polymers in 64 of 68 whole-blood samples, or approximately 94%, indicating widespread internal exposure [111]. In a related 2022 investigation, microplastics were identified in approximately 77% of human blood samples collected from 22 volunteers, further supporting the ubiquity of plastic particle pollution in human biological systems [112]. Another study detected nanoplastics in the human placenta, raising concerns about potential developmental risks [113]. Major sources include degradation of larger plastic debris, synthetic textiles, tire abrasion, and personal care products containing microbeads [114,115]. The detection of microplastics and nanoplastics across global aquatic systems has shifted their conceptualization from physical debris to complex biogeochemical agents. In coastal and high-energy aquatic environments, microplastic occurrence is governed by hydrodynamic sorting, a process driven by turbulent mixing and Stokes drift that influences the vertical positioning of particles regardless of their inherent density [116]. While the density of the base polymer (e.g., low-density polyethylene vs. polyvinyl chloride) dictates initial buoyancy, the fate of particles is rapidly altered by biofouling [117]. Colonization of plastic surfaces by microbial communities, known as the plastisphere, increases the effective density of particles, promoting settling into sediments [118]. Furthermore, the detection of high-density polymers in surface waters is often explained by the formation of an eco-corona. Surface-active substances and extracellular polymeric substances from phytoplankton can modify particle buoyancy through aggregation–settling mechanisms, bypassing traditional density-based flotation models [117,118].
Environmental fate is influenced by size, density, and polymer type. Polyethylene and polypropylene dominate aquatic microplastics, whereas polyester fibers are prevalent in terrestrial and atmospheric compartments due to textile washing [119,120]. Weathering processes, including photodegradation and mechanical abrasion, accelerate fragmentation and generate nanoplastics that evade filtration barriers in wastewater treatment plants [121,122]. In the benthic zone, microplastics and nanoplastics undergo further fragmentation through mechanical abrasion and ultraviolet-induced photo-oxidation [123]. Photo-oxidation involves the formation of surface carbonyl groups through free radical chain reactions, increasing particle hydrophilicity and sorption capacity [118,123]. In sedimentary environments, sediment-bound microplastics act as long-term sinks due to their persistence and gradual accumulation within benthic systems. Deep-sea investigations have revealed substantial microplastic accumulation in benthic sediments, with biological and oceanographic transport processes contributing to downward transfer and sequestration in the deep ocean [124,125].
In groundwater, nanoplastic transport is governed by colloid filtration theory. Nanoplastics migrate through porous media via advection–dispersion but are attenuated by deposition into secondary energy minima on soil-grain surfaces, a process highly sensitive to ionic strength and pH [126,127]. Nanoplastics are also captured at narrow pore throats within the aquifer matrix [128]. However, heavy rainfall can trigger remobilization: changes in ionic strength and flow velocity perturb the secondary energy minima, releasing trapped nanoplastics and facilitating deep-subsurface transport [129,130].
Mechanistic studies have shown that microplastics can act as carriers for heavy metals and hydrophobic organic contaminants, enhancing their mobility and bioavailability. Specifically, the high surface area of fragmented microplastics and nanoplastics facilitates sorption of hitchhiking hydrophobic organic pollutants, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PCBs, through hydrophobic partitioning and π–π interactions [131]. This process can enhance the bioavailability and toxicity of co-contaminants through a Trojan-horse effect [127]. Microplastics and nanoplastics can also alter gut microbiota composition in aquatic organisms, impairing nutrient absorption and immunity [132,133]. In aquatic biota, nanoplastics can be taken up through endocytosis or passive diffusion across gill and intestinal membranes due to their nanoscale dimensions [131]. Once internalized, nanoplastics interact with cellular proteins to form a protein corona, which dictates their intracellular trafficking and potential translocation to the circulatory system and vital organs [131,134]. Owing to their extremely small size, nanoplastics can cross biological barriers, facilitating systemic distribution and toxicological effects. Experimental studies have demonstrated that nanoplastics can translocate across epithelial tissues and accumulate in organs, including the brain, where they may induce neurobehavioral responses and oxidative stress [135–137]. Notably, trophic transfer from zooplankton to fish and higher predators has been documented, raising concerns about bioaccumulation [138,139].
The effects of microplastics and nanoplastics extend beyond physical accumulation. They can sorb hydrophobic organic pollutants and heavy metals, acting as vectors for co-contaminants. Their small size also enables cellular uptake, where they may induce oxidative stress, inflammation, and cytotoxicity. Trophic transfer has been demonstrated in aquatic food webs, highlighting concerns about bioaccumulation and biomagnification [140,141].
Figure 3 depicts the mechanisms by which microplastics and nanoplastics sorb pollutants, are ingested, and transfer contaminants across trophic levels.
EDCs
EDCs mimic or interfere with endogenous hormones and disrupt normal endocrine signaling. BPA, bisphenol S, and phthalates remain among the most studied compounds, whereas newer substitutes such as bisphenol AF are increasingly detected in environmental matrices [142,143]. Evidence suggests that BPA substitutes may not be safer than BPA, as in vitro studies have reported estrogenic activities comparable to or greater than those of BPA [144,145]. EDCs such as bisphenols, phthalates, and parabens interfere with hormonal signaling pathways. Their ubiquity in consumer products, ranging from plastics to cosmetics, contributes to widespread environmental release. Mechanistically, these chemicals mimic or antagonize natural hormones by binding to receptors, such as estrogen, androgen, or thyroid hormone receptors, thereby disrupting developmental and reproductive processes [146–148].
EDCs, including natural estrogens, synthetic hormones such as 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2), and industrial phenols such as BPA and nonylphenol, exhibit complex environmental behavior governed by physicochemical properties, particularly lipophilicity (logKow), ionization state, and hydrogen-bonding capacity. In surface waters, these chemicals undergo photochemical and microbial transformation. Studies have shown that chromophoric dissolved organic matter can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), including singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals, which facilitate indirect photochemical degradation of estrogenic compounds such as EE2 [149,150]. In groundwater and soil, EDC transport is controlled by hydrophobic partitioning, adsorption to organic matter, and interactions with mineral surface hydroxyl groups. Mobility is strongly pH-dependent because deprotonation at pH values above the pKa increases aqueous solubility and reduces sorption to negatively charged soil matrices [151]. In sediments, alkylphenolic EDCs may accumulate within organic-rich fractions, forming persistent contaminant reservoirs, although environmental changes can promote remobilization into overlying waters.
The occurrence of EDCs in aquatic systems reflects a progression from anthropogenic discharge to receptor-mediated biological interference. Wastewater treatment plant effluents remain major sources of estrogenic compounds, such as EE2, in rivers and estuaries, where chronic exposure has been associated with feminization and reproductive disruption in fish populations [152,153]. The environmental persistence of EE2 is partly attributable to its structural stability, particularly ethinyl substitution at the C17 position, which reduces biodegradation efficiency and contributes to pseudo-persistence in aquatic environments [154]. In groundwater and subsurface systems, the transport and persistence of EDCs such as BPA are strongly influenced by redox conditions and microbial degradation pathways. BPA degradation is substantially reduced under anaerobic conditions, increasing contaminant persistence and mobility in oxygen-limited aquifers [155,156]. In estuarine and sedimentary systems, increasing salinity may enhance sediment–water partitioning of hydrophobic EDCs through salting-out effects, thereby promoting accumulation within organic-rich benthic sediments. Consequently, sediments can function as long-term contaminant reservoirs with potential for later remobilization. In aquatic organisms, EDC toxicity is mediated primarily through estrogen receptor-dependent pathways. Because compounds such as EE2 structurally resemble endogenous estrogens, they activate the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis and induce hepatic vitellogenin synthesis in male fish, even at ng/L concentrations, producing reproductive and population-level effects [152,153]. Importantly, EDCs can trigger physiological responses at ultra-trace concentrations because endocrine regulatory pathways are highly sensitive to hormonal perturbation [157,158].
Exposure to EDCs is linked to reproductive toxicity, developmental delays, obesity, diabetes, and certain cancers [159,160]. Recent monitoring studies have reported persistent endocrine disruption and intersex conditions in wild fish exposed to treated wastewater effluents containing estrogenic and anti-androgenic compounds [161]. Amphibian metamorphosis has also been disrupted by thyroid-active contaminants, such as alkylphenols, phthalates, and parabens [162].
Recent studies have highlighted the epigenetic effects of EDCs, including heritable DNA methylation changes induced by low-dose exposure that persist across generations [163,164]. These findings challenge traditional risk assessment models based on acute toxicity thresholds and emphasize the need for long-term and transgenerational studies [165,166].
Recent epidemiological studies have associated EDC exposure with reduced fertility, developmental anomalies, obesity, and metabolic disorders [167,168]. Field studies have also continued to report endocrine disruption in aquatic and terrestrial wildlife, along with reproductive impairments associated with pesticide- and EDC-related hormonal disruption in birds [161,169].
ENMs
ENMs are increasingly recognized both as emerging pollutants and as potential technological solutions. Nanomaterials, including silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂-NPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene-based materials, and zinc oxide nanoparticles, are increasingly incorporated into consumer products, electronics, and industrial applications. They may be released during manufacturing, product use, and end-of-life disposal [170,171]. AgNPs are widely used in antimicrobial coatings, textiles, and medical devices, while TiO₂-NPs are present in sunscreens and food packaging. Their increasing use has raised concerns about environmental accumulation [172,173].
ENMs, including metallic (Ag, zinc oxide), carbon-based (CNTs, graphene), and metal oxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles, exhibit environmental behavior distinct from that of bulk materials because of their high surface area, elevated surface energy, and nanoscale physicochemical properties. In aquatic systems, their fate is governed by colloidal stability, surface functionalization, aggregation behavior, and chemical transformation. In surface waters, ENMs commonly undergo heteroaggregation with suspended minerals and NOM, processes that can be described using Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek interaction theory. Adsorption of humic substances may promote steric stabilization, thereby increasing ENM persistence in the water column [174,175]. Metallic ENMs, such as AgNPs, also undergo oxidative dissolution, releasing silver ions that substantially contribute to toxicity [176]. In groundwater systems, ENM transport is strongly influenced by deposition, pore-throat straining, and attachment efficiency in porous media, with elevated ionic strength compressing the electrical double layer and promoting retention [175]. In sediments and anaerobic environments, metallic ENMs may undergo sulfidation reactions that form metal-sulfide phases such as silver sulfide, reducing dissolution and bioavailability [177]. In aquatic biota, ENMs can enter cells through endocytosis and trophic-transfer pathways, then induce oxidative stress through ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunction [178,179].
The environmental behavior of ENMs is influenced by size, surface charge, shape, and coating. Aggregation, dissolution, and interactions with NOM govern their mobility and bioavailability. Their nanoscale size enables penetration of biological membranes, where they may induce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and genotoxicity [180–182]. Dissolution is particularly important for metal-based nanoparticles, with AgNPs releasing toxic silver ions [182].
Toxicity mechanisms include oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and immune disruption. A 2024 study demonstrated that chronic exposure to TiO₂-NPs altered zebrafish brain development and behavior [182,183]. In soils, ENMs interact with microbial communities, potentially altering nutrient cycling [184–186]. Key findings regarding the occurrence, environmental impacts, and detection techniques for the major classes of ENMs are summarized in Table 2.
Analytical Limitations and Standardization Challenges of ECs
Detection and quantification of ECs, including PFAS, PPCPs, microplastics, and nanoplastics, present substantial technical and regulatory bottlenecks [2,12,187].
Analytical Vulnerabilities and Detection Limits
A major analytical limitation is the extreme complexity and diversity of environmental matrices [2]. PPCPs and antibiotics occur in aquatic environments at ultra-trace concentrations, requiring highly sensitive methods such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry [107,108]. However, these methods are frequently affected by matrix effects, which cause signal suppression or enhancement during ionization and compromise data accuracy [107].
For PFAS, analytical challenges are exacerbated by the large number of compounds and the continuous transformation of precursors [32,188]. Traditional target screening often underestimates the total PFAS burden because it does not capture novel alternatives and short-chain variants [38,46]. Quantifying ultra-small particles, such as nanoplastics, also exceeds the capacity of many current technologies. Standard approaches often fail to resolve the structural and chemical changes of highly weathered submicron plastics in complex biological or environmental matrices, necessitating specialized Py–GC/MS workflows [110–112].
Standardization Barriers
Standardization remains limited across EC research [5]. The lack of harmonized, globally accepted sampling and extraction protocols introduces substantial variability across independent monitoring studies [5,11]. Environmental risk assessment is further complicated because traditional regulatory frameworks evaluate single substances and often do not consider the cumulative, transgenerational, or synergistic toxicity of real-world chemical mixtures [15,78,105]. Without standardized reference materials and harmonized analytical criteria, establishing enforceable global thresholds for these contaminants remains difficult [5,189,190].
ECs exhibit environmental behaviors that distinguish them from conventional pollutants. Their pollution mechanisms are shaped by their physicochemical properties, interactions with environmental matrices, and capacity for transformation. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for predicting persistence, bioaccumulation, and long-term effects.
Transport Pathways
ECs are introduced into the environment through diverse sources, including wastewater effluents, agricultural runoff, industrial emissions, and atmospheric deposition. Once released, they undergo complex transport processes: (1) Aqueous transport: Hydrophilic compounds, such as short-chain PFAS and many pharmaceuticals, remain dissolved in water, facilitating long-range transport in rivers and groundwater [191,192]. (2) Atmospheric transport: Volatile and semi-volatile compounds, including some phthalates and PFAS precursors, partition into the atmosphere and undergo global distribution, helping explain detections in polar regions [193,194]. (3) Particle association: Hydrophobic compounds, such as bisphenols, musks, and hydrophobic pharmaceuticals, adsorb strongly onto organic matter and sediments, influencing persistence [195–197].
Microplastics serve as vectors for co-contaminants by adsorbing metals and hydrophobic organic pollutants on their surfaces and transporting them across ecosystems [88,198].
Persistence and Transformation
The persistence of ECs is governed by their resistance to degradation. PFAS exemplify extreme persistence because of the stability of the carbon–fluorine bond, whereas pharmaceuticals such as carbamazepine can persist through conventional wastewater treatment [199–201].
Transformation processes include the following: (1) Biodegradation: Some PPCPs undergo microbial degradation, producing metabolites that may be more toxic than the parent compounds [202]. (2) Photodegradation: EDCs, such as triclosan, undergo photolytic breakdown, although reactive intermediates such as dioxins may form [203]. (3) Abiotic transformation: ENMs undergo aggregation, dissolution, or surface modification, altering their toxicity and mobility [182,204].
Mathematically, contaminant degradation is often modeled using pseudo-first-order kinetics:
lnC0Ct=kt,
where C0 is the initial concentration, Ct is the concentration at time t, and k is the degradation rate constant. This model is widely applied to evaluate contaminant fate in soil and aquatic systems [205–207].
Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer
Lipophilic contaminants, such as parabens, musks, and certain PFAS, bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms. Microplastics are ingested by plankton and invertebrates and subsequently transferred to fish and higher predators, illustrating trophic transfer [208,209].
Recent studies support seafood consumption as a potential route of human exposure. For instance, a 2021 field study across 44 locations in Flanders, Belgium, reported a median PFAS concentration of approximately 22.4 ng/g wet weight, with a site range of 8.56–157 ng/g, demonstrating that mussels can accumulate PFAS at levels relevant to exposure assessment [210]. Similarly, fish species analyzed from African freshwater lakes contained microplastics in 80% of samples, highlighting trophic contamination risk [211]. The combined transport pathways, transformation processes, and bioaccumulation dynamics of ECs are synthesized in the conceptual model shown in Figure 4.
The mechanistic processes that govern the environmental behavior of ECs directly shape exposure pathways and toxicological outcomes in ecosystems and humans. Ecotoxicological effects of ECs occur at multiple levels of biological organization, ranging from molecular perturbations and altered gene expression to population-level effects and changes in ecosystem function [212].
Mechanistic Pathways of Toxicity

Endocrine disruption and receptor-mediated signaling

Many ECs exert effects primarily through endocrine or immune modulation rather than overt cytotoxicity. Consequently, traditional apical endpoints, such as mortality or gross pathology, are often insensitive to these effects. Subclinical biomarkers, altered developmental trajectories, and epigenetic modifications have therefore become critical endpoints for assessing exposure-related risks and mechanistic perturbations [213,214].
Mechanistically, EDCs and certain PFAS homologues alter homeostatic control by binding to specific nuclear receptors. Long-term epidemiological research has associated certain PFAS with developmental delays, dysregulated lipid metabolism, and increased cancer risk through endocrine disruption and epigenetic modulation [215,216]. Unlike traditional PCBs, which are stored in adipose tissue, PFAS bind to the ligand-binding domain of PPARs, altering lipid transport and downstream metabolic signaling [217].
Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
In vitro research indicates that cellular and subcellular exposure to nanoplastics and ENMs can induce oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, and, in some models, genotoxic effects [218]. Metal-based nanoparticles produce toxicity through both particle-mediated and ion-mediated mechanisms. Particulate forms interact directly with lipid bilayers and organelles, inducing oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. For instance, AgNPs induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial injury and mediate autophagy through the Akt/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway [219]. Simultaneously, these metallic ENMs undergo oxidative dissolution, releasing toxic free ions (such as Ag+) that bind to cellular thiols, inactivate vital respiratory enzymes, and disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential [220,221].
Trophic Transfer and Particulate Vectors
Microplastics and nanoplastics exert both physical and chemical effects. Particle ingestion can cause physical blockages, reduced feeding efficiency, and internal abrasions in invertebrates and fish [222,223]. Beyond mechanical damage, particulate vectors, including microplastics, nanoplastics, and ENMs, can fundamentally alter exposure profiles [224]. Plastics act as carriers for other contaminants: hydrophobic organic compounds and metals sorbed to plastic surfaces can desorb under gut-like chemical conditions, increasing bioavailability and internal dose [225,226]. The high surface area of fragmented microplastics and nanoplastics facilitates the sorption of hitchhiking hydrophobic pollutants, enhancing the bioavailability and toxicity of these co-contaminants through a Trojan-horse effect. Trophic transfer from zooplankton to fish and higher predators has been documented, raising concerns about bioaccumulation and biomagnification across aquatic food webs [223,224].
Comparative Toxicity Insights
Persistence, mobility, and structural stability vary substantially across contaminant classes, shaping their comparative hazard profiles. The presence of numerous PFAS homologues complicates dose–response assessment because potency varies by chain length and functional group [227]. Total organic fluorine measurements have revealed substantial unidentified fluorinated mass, underscoring uncertainty in exposure assessment and risk characterization [228].
Whereas legacy hydrophobic pollutants partition predictably into adipose tissue according to hydrophobicity, pharmaceuticals and EDCs can exhibit high environmental mobility and targeted biological activity at ultra-trace concentrations. Moreover, transformation products may retain or exceed the toxicity of their parent compounds [229]. For example, carbamazepine metabolites show greater genotoxicity than the original drug, and pesticide transformation products can create highly toxic secondary inputs in aquatic matrices [230]. These findings underscore the need for whole-mixture toxicity assessment rather than assessment focused only on parent compounds [231].
Recent Ecotoxicological and Epidemiological Findings

Wildlife and ecosystem impairments

Pharmaceutical residues and their transformation products produce a range of sublethal effects in aquatic organisms, including endocrine disruption, altered behavior, impaired reproduction, and immune modulation [232]. Antidepressants and anxiolytics, which are detectable at ng/L levels in surface waters, can influence fish feeding and predator avoidance behaviors, contributing to erosion of behavioral plasticity and pace-of-life shifts under multigenerational pharmaceutical pollution [233]. In fish, long-term exposure to widespread pharmaceutical pollution can produce trade-offs among behavioral, life-history, and reproductive traits [234]. For example, long-term fluoxetine exposure has shown sex-specific effects on inhibitory control in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) [235].
Antibiotic residues indirectly threaten human health by driving the selection and enrichment of antimicrobial resistance within environmental microbiomes. For example, subinhibitory gentamicin pollution induces integration of gentamicin resistance genes into class 1 integrons in the environment [236]. Environmental hotspots with elevated antibiotic concentrations consistently show increased abundances of antibiotic resistance genes, enabling resistance determinants to return to human and animal populations [237]. These residues also have substantial ecological consequences, including shifts in sediment functional traits and microbial community structure, impaired nutrient cycling, and possible decline or loss of sensitive taxa [238]. Similarly, soil and sediment exposure to ENMs alters microbial community composition and enzymatic functions essential to nutrient cycling, with potentially larger-scale effects on ecosystem productivity [239].
Human Health Implications
From a human health perspective, exposure pathways include ingestion of contaminated water and food, inhalation of airborne nanoparticles and microfibers, and dermal contact with consumer products [240,241]. The toxicological profile depends on dose, exposure timing (such as prenatal versus adult exposure), mixture composition, and individual susceptibility [242].
Recent epidemiological and toxicological studies have strengthened evidence linking chemical co-exposures, including PFAS and EDCs, to adverse cardiovascular and neurological outcomes through convergent mechanistic pathways such as oxidative stress and inflammation [213,243]. ECs may also influence multigenerational epigenetic transmission, in which low-dose in utero exposure induces heritable DNA methylation changes that persist across generations [214,215]. Recent reports of microplastics in human placenta and blood further confirm the ubiquity of plastic particle pollution in human biological systems, correlating with altered coagulation markers and raising concerns about prenatal exposure and developmental programming [244,245].
Collectively, the mechanistic evidence indicates that many ECs are persistent or continuously reintroduced into the environment [212], and their transformation products may retain or exceed the toxicity of the parent compounds [229]. Additionally, particulate vectors, including microplastics, nanoplastics, and ENMs, can substantially alter exposure profiles, while mixture effects and low-dose endocrine or immune perturbations remain central considerations for realistic risk assessment [231]. These conclusions underscore the need for monitoring strategies that capture both parent compounds and transformation products, integration of mechanistic biomarkers into epidemiological studies, and comprehensive evaluation protocols, such as wastewater-based epidemiology, to track unintentional human exposure to potentially harmful chemical mixtures.
Research and policy on ECs are converging toward prevention, precision monitoring, and sustainable remediation. Five broad themes shape this direction. The first is source control and green chemistry, which focus on designing inherently safer chemicals, such as biodegradable pharmaceuticals, fluorine-free surfactants, and degradable plastics, to reduce reliance on expensive end-of-pipe solutions. The second theme is next-generation monitoring, in which advances in high-resolution mass spectrometry, artificial intelligence-assisted non-target analysis, and portable nanotechnology-based sensors may enable real-time contaminant detection and transform risk assessment. The third is energy-efficient destruction, with innovations in catalytic electrodes, visible-light photocatalysis, and plasma reactors offering pathways to reduce the energy demands of destructive treatment technologies and improve scalability. The fourth involves hybrid and circular treatment systems that integrate processes designed not only to remove pollutants but also to valorize waste streams; examples include recovering valuable metals from ENMs and converting algal biomass into biofuels, in alignment with circular economy principles. Finally, equity and global cooperation are essential. Bridging capacity gaps in low- and middle-income countries through technology transfer, training, and funding is crucial to ensure that EC management avoids deepening global inequalities.
ECs represent a global environmental concern due to their widespread occurrence, persistence, and complex interactions within natural systems. Contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, PFAS, microplastics, nanoplastics, and EDCs are frequently reported in water, sediment, soil, air, and aquatic organisms, highlighting their extensive environmental distribution. Their continuous release and resistance to degradation contribute to long-term accumulation and ecological instability. These contaminants alter biological functions, disrupt endocrine and metabolic processes, induce oxidative stress, and threaten biodiversity across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Human exposure through contaminated water, food chains, and consumer products further raises concerns about chronic health effects and environmental sustainability. The increasing diversity and complexity of ECs underscore the need for a deeper understanding of their environmental behavior, transformation pathways, bioaccumulation potential, and ecological consequences to support informed environmental management and protect public health.
• Emerging environmental contaminants are persistent and bioaccumulative and can undergo complex transformations across ecosystems.
• Complex environmental matrices and matrix-related signal suppression substantially compromise the accuracy of ultra-trace detection of emerging contaminants.
• Reported impacts include endocrine disruption, genotoxicity, antimicrobial resistance, and ecological imbalance.
• The lack of harmonized protocols and mixture toxicity assessments hinders the development of global regulatory limits.
• Emerging contaminants occur in water, soil, air, and biota, with implications for ecosystem function and human health.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

None.

Availability of Data

Not applicable.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: AOS; Data curation: AOS; Formal analysis: AOS; Investigation: AOS; Methodology: AOS; Project administration: AOS; Resources: all authors; Software: AOS; Supervision: AOS; Validation: all authors; Visualization: all authors; Writing–original draft: AOS; Writing–review & editing: all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses workflow showing the number of studies identified, screened, excluded, and included.
Objectives: This review aimed to synthesize recent advances in the understanding of emerging contaminants (ECs), including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, microplastics and nanoplastics, endocrine-disrupt
Figure 2.
Sources and pathways by which emerging contaminants enter and move through the environment.
Objectives: This review aimed to synthesize recent advances in the understanding of emerging contaminants (ECs), including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, microplastics and nanoplastics, endocrine-disrupt
Figure 3.
Microplastics and nanoplastics as vectors of other pollutants.
Objectives: This review aimed to synthesize recent advances in the understanding of emerging contaminants (ECs), including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, microplastics and nanoplastics, endocrine-disrupt
Figure 4.
Conceptual diagram of the environmental fate and transport of emerging contaminants.
Objectives: This review aimed to synthesize recent advances in the understanding of emerging contaminants (ECs), including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, microplastics and nanoplastics, endocrine-disrupt
Table 1.
Summary of recent PFAS studies published from 2022 to 2024, including environmental concentration ranges, matrices studied, and analytical techniques used
Table 1.
Reported concentration range (representative PFAS) Matrix studied Analytical techniques reported Ref.
PFOA: <0.03 ng/L to ~7 mg/L; PFOS: 0.01 ng/L to ~5 mg/L; highest groundwater concentration for 6:2 FTS was ~15 mg/L Groundwater; global synthesis of 96 studies Aggregated published measurements, mainly LC–MS/MS after extraction; meta-analysis [68]
PFAS detected in ~54% of wells; typical concentrations ranged from ng/L to µg/L, with some mixtures >70 ng/L Groundwater and well drinking-water sources in the eastern United States; 254 samples Targeted LC–MS/MS for 24 PFAS; co-analysis of dissolved organic carbon and ions [69]
Species-dependent PFAS concentrations in tissues ranged from a few ng/g to µg/g; PFOS was often highest Marine matrices (seawater, sediments, plankton, invertebrates, fish, and predators) Literature survey: mainly SPE+LC–MS/MS, with increasing use of HRMS for suspect/non-target screening [70]
Multiple PFAS detected in fish; PFOS accounted for 13%–90% of total PFAS; concentrations ranged from ng/g to hundreds of ng/g; AFFF-signature PFAS detected >8 km from source Surface waters, sediment, and aquatic biota, including fish and eel, along a hydrological gradient Targeted LC–MS/MS for 38 PFAS + extractable organic fluorine; spatial, isotopic, and statistical source attribution [71]
Food and seafood showed the highest PFAS concentrations; concentrations generally reported in ng/g wet weight; >150,000 entries reviewed Multiple matrices, including water, sediments, biota, and food, such as seafood, meat, and eggs Aggregated literature + data from monitoring programs; typically SPE+LC–MS/MS [72]
PFAS in the subsurface ranged from ng/L background levels to mg/L levels near sources; replacement PFAS (e.g., 6:2 FTS) noted Subsurface soil–groundwater continuum, including AFFF and industrial sites LC–MS/MS and HRMS screening; sampling and transport challenges discussed [73]

PFAS, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; ref., reference; PFOA, perfluorooctanoic acid; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate; FTS, fluorotelomer sulfonate; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; SPE, solid-phase extraction; HRMS, high-resolution mass spectrometry; AFFF, aqueous film-forming foam.

Table 2.
Engineered nanomaterials: occurrence, impacts, and detection methods
Table 2.
ENM class Environmental occurrence Key environmental or ecotoxicological impacts Detection or quantification methods (2022–2025)
Polystyrene and other polymeric nanoplastics Detected in 11 of 15 aquatic samples, with concentrations <0.07–0.73 µg/L after enrichment and Py–GC/MS Ingestion by aquatic organisms, trophic transfer, and sublethal effects mediated by surface interactions Py–GC/MS after enrichment; microscopy and spectroscopy for size and morphology
Silver nanoparticles Detected in seafood, surface waters, and wastewater effluents Silver ion release can cause oxidative stress, microbial disruption, organismal internalization, and size-dependent toxicity sp-ICP-MS for particle size and number and for dissolved versus particulate silver; TEM/SEM for morphology
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles Present in wastewater, biosolids, sediments, surface waters, and marine systems Reactive oxygen species generation under sunlight, sediment accumulation, and effects on algae, benthic organisms, and microbes sp-ICP-MS, sector-field ICP-MS, TEM/HR-TEM, AF4-MALS for size fractionation, and ultraviolet-visible or fluorescence methods for some hybrids
Quantum dots containing cadmium or lead Occur near industrial and urban discharge sites and have been detected in sediments and waters Release of toxic cadmium or lead; cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and metal accumulation in organisms Fluorescence spectroscopy for intact quantum dots; ICP-MS for metal release and speciation; AF4 for separation; TEM for particle integrity
Cerium oxide nanoparticles Detected in wastewater effluent, sediments, and soils near industrial use areas Mixed antioxidant and pro-oxidant effects, microbial community impacts, and potential bioaccumulation ICP-MS or sp-ICP-MS for particulate and dissolved cerium; microscopy; separation techniques for polydisperse samples

ENM, engineered nanomaterial; Py–GC/MS, pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; sp-ICP-MS, single-particle ICP-MS; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; HR-TEM, high-resolution TEM; AF4, asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation; AF4-MALS, AF4 with multiangle light scattering.

  • 1. Wang F, Xiang L, Sze-Yin Leung K, et al. Emerging contaminants: a One Health perspective. Innovation (Camb) 2024;5:100612.
  • 2. Singh CK, Sodhi KK, Vaishnavi Rajagopalan NV, et al. Managing the complexity of emerging contaminants in aquatic environments: exploring their ecotoxicological impacts, detection techniques, and the use of innovative technologies for their remediation. Discov Catal 2025;2:9.
  • 3. Das RK, Marma M, Mizan A, et al. Heavy metals and microplastics as emerging contaminants in Bangladesh’s river systems: evidence from urban-industrial corridors. Toxics 2025;13:803.
  • 4. Chakraborty A, Adhikary S, Bhattacharya S, et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products as emerging environmental contaminants: prevalence, toxicity, and remedial approaches. ACS Chem Health Saf 2023;30:362−88.
  • 5. Puri M, Gandhi K, Kumar MS. Emerging environmental contaminants: a global perspective on policies and regulations. J Environ Manage 2023;332:117344.
  • 6. Boahen E, Owusu L, Adjei-Anim SO. A comprehensive review of emerging environmental contaminants of global concern. Discov Environ 2025;3:144.
  • 7. Mayilswami S, Raval NP, Tomar R, et al. Potential human health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) prevalent in aquatic environment: a review. Environ Sci Adv 2025;4:1939−62.
  • 8. Ilango AK, Arathala P, Musah RA, et al. Experimental and density functional theory investigation of surface-modified biopolymer for improved adsorption of mixtures of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water. Water Res 2024;255:121458.
  • 9. Pan CG, Sun RX. Understanding PFAS: occurrence, fate, removal, and effects. Toxics 2024;12:605.
  • 10. Obbard RW, Sadri S, Wong YQ, et al. Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earths Future 2014;2:315−20.
  • 11. Hamilton BM, Jantunen LJ, Bergmann M, et al. Microplastics in the atmosphere and cryosphere in the circumpolar North: a case for multicompartment monitoring. Arct Sci 2022;8:1116−26.
  • 12. Materic D, Kjær HA, Vallelonga P, et al. Nanoplastics measurements in Northern and Southern polar ice. Environ Res 2022;208:112741.
  • 13. Darvishi P, Mousavi SA, Mahmoudi A, et al. A comprehensive review on the removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater using carbon nanotubes: synthesis, performance, and future challenges. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2023;9:11−37.
  • 14. Moreira DG, Aires A, de Lourdes Pereira M, et al. Levels and effects of antidepressant drugs to aquatic organisms. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2022;256:109322.
  • 15. Weng X, Zhu Q, Liao C, et al. Cumulative exposure to phthalates and their alternatives and associated female reproductive health: body burdens, adverse outcomes, and underlying mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 2023;57:8189−212.
  • 16. Lu L, Liu Y, Yang Y, et al. Bisphenol A exposure interferes with reproductive hormones and decreases sperm counts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Toxics 2024;12:294.
  • 17. Brunn H, Arnold G, Korner W, et al. PFAS: forever chemicals—persistent, bioaccumulative and mobile: reviewing the status and the need for their phase out and remediation of contaminated sites. Environ Sci Eur 2023;35:20.
  • 18. Wernicke T, Rojo-Nieto E, Paschke A, et al. Exploring the partitioning of hydrophobic organic compounds between water, suspended particulate matter and diverse fish species in a German river ecosystem. Environ Sci Eur 2022;34:66.
  • 19. Liu BM, Hayes AW. Mechanisms and assessment of genotoxicity of metallic engineered nanomaterials in the human environment. Biomedicines 2024;12:2401.
  • 20. Kang M, Liu Y, Weng Y, et al. A critical review on the toxicity regulation and ecological risks of zinc oxide nanoparticles to plants. Environ Sci Nano 2024;11:14−35.
  • 21. Ehalt Macedo H, Lehner B, Nicell JA, et al. Antibiotics in the global river system arising from human consumption. PNAS Nexus 2025;4:pgaf096.
  • 22. Xiao Y, Du Z, Li Y, et al. A review on the application of biosensors for monitoring emerging contaminants in the water environment. Sensors (Basel) 2025;25:4945.
  • 23. Feng S, Wang W, Huang R, et al. A review of typical water pollution control and cost-benefit analysis in China. Front Environ Sci 2024;12:1406155.
  • 24. Rout PR, Zhang TC, Bhunia P, et al. Treatment technologies for emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment plants: a review. Sci Total Environ 2021;753:141990.
  • 25. Li Y, Li Y, Zhang S, et al. Global distribution, ecotoxicity, and treatment technologies of emerging contaminants in aquatic environments: a recent five-year review. Toxics 2025;13:616.
  • 26. Gluge J, Scheringer M, Cousins IT, et al. An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environ Sci Process Impacts 2020;22:2345−73.
  • 27. Keane CA, Li J, Li J, et al. High levels of antibiotics released by a pharmaceutical manufacturer negatively impacted wastewater treatment plant performance. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2025;11:903−13.
  • 28. Wang L, Wang H, Huang Q, et al. Microplastics in landfill leachate: a comprehensive review on characteristics, detection, and their fates during advanced oxidation processes. Water (Basel) 2023;15:252.
  • 29. Frey L, Tanunchai B, Glaser B. Antibiotics residues in pig slurry and manure and its environmental contamination potential: a meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 2022;42:31.
  • 30. Schroeder T, Bond D, Foley J. PFAS soil and groundwater contamination via industrial airborne emission and land deposition in SW Vermont and Eastern New York State, USA. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2021;23:291−301.
  • 31. Roy JW, Propp VR, Hua T, et al. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination of surface waters by historic landfills via groundwater plumes: ecosystem exposure and downstream mass loading. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2025;27:1074−87.
  • 32. Shirke AV, Radke EG, Jones R, et al. Systematic evidence map for the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) universe. Environ Health Perspect 2026;134:252−73.
  • 33. Shirke AV, Radke EG, Lin C, et al. Expanded systematic evidence map for hundreds of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and comprehensive PFAS human health dashboard. Environ Health Perspect 2024;132:26001.
  • 34. Stoiber T, Evans S, Naidenko OV. Disposal of products and materials containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a cyclical problem. Chemosphere 2020;260:127659.
  • 35. Buck RC, Franklin J, Berger U, et al. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2011;7:513−41.
  • 36. Cousins IT, Johansson JH, Salter ME, et al. Outside the safe operating space of a new planetary boundary for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environ Sci Technol 2022;56:11172−9.
  • 37. Sharma A, Jorvekar SB, Bhowmik S, et al. Comprehensive assessment of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in groundwater of Kamrup, Assam, India: occurrence, health risks, and metabolomic insights. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2024;26:1601−17.
  • 38. Lenka SP, Kah M, Chen JL, et al. Adsorption mechanisms of short-chain and ultrashort-chain PFAS on anion exchange resins and activated carbon. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 2024;10:1280−93.
  • 39. Koulini GV, Nambi IM. Occurrence of forever chemicals in Chennai waters, India. Environ Sci Eur 2024;36:60.
  • 40. Liu Y, Li T, Bao J, et al. A review of treatment techniques for short-chain perfluoroalkyl substances. Appl Sci 2022;12:1941.
  • 41. Brusseau ML. Differential sorption of short-chain versus long-chain anionic per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances by soils. Environments 2023;10:175.
  • 42. Costanza J, Arshadi M, Abriola LM, et al. Accumulation of PFOA and PFOS at the air-water interface. Environ Sci Technol Lett 2019;6:487−91.
  • 43. Brusseau ML. Simulating PFAS transport influenced by rate-limited multi-process retention. Water Res 2020;168:115179.
  • 44. Ahrens L, Rakovic J, Ekdahl S, et al. Environmental distribution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) on Svalbard: local sources and long-range transport to the Arctic. Chemosphere 2023;345:140463.
  • 45. Bai X, Son Y. Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface water and sediments from two urban watersheds in Nevada, USA. Sci Total Environ 2021;751:141622.
  • 46. Ackerman Grunfeld D, Gilbert D, Hou J, et al. Underestimated burden of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in global surface waters and groundwaters. Nat Geosci 2024;17:340−6.
  • 47. Lenka SP, Kah M, Padhye LP. A review of the occurrence, transformation, and removal of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 2021;199:117187.
  • 48. Mustafa K, de Falco G, Fernando E, et al. Assessing PFAS and their precursor transformation in a landfill leachate-impacted wastewater treatment plant. Water Environ Res 2025;97:e70172.
  • 49. Brusseau ML, Van Glubt S. The influence of molecular structure on PFAS adsorption at air-water interfaces in electrolyte solutions. Chemosphere 2021;281:130829.
  • 50. Campos-Pereira H, Kleja DB, Sjostedt C, et al. The adsorption of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) onto ferrihydrite is governed by surface charge. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:15722−30.
  • 51. Mejia-Avendano S, Zhi Y, Yan B, et al. Sorption of polyfluoroalkyl surfactants on surface soils: effect of molecular structures, soil properties, and solution chemistry. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:1513−21.
  • 52. Gao Y, Zhang Z, Chen D, et al. The sediment-water partitioning characteristics of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in urban rivers receiving reclaimed water. Toxics 2026;14:190.
  • 53. Ng CA, Hungerbuhler K. Bioaccumulation of perfluorinated alkyl acids: observations and models. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:4637−48.
  • 54. Flynn RW, Haskins DL, Hamilton MT, et al. Trophic magnification and distribution of PFAS in an aqueous film forming foam-affected aquatic food web. Environ Toxicol Chem 2026;45:1408−19.
  • 55. Du D, Lu Y, Zhou Y, et al. Bioaccumulation, trophic transfer and biomagnification of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in the marine food web of the South China Sea. J Hazard Mater 2021;405:124681.
  • 56. Antoniou EE, Dekant W. Childhood PFAS exposure and immunotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies. Syst Rev 2024;13:176.
  • 57. Bailey JM, Wang L, McDonald JM, et al. Immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in a population with a history of elevated exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) through drinking water. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2023;33:725−36.
  • 58. van Gerwen M, Chung T, Monaghan M, et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Toxicol Lett 2024;399:52−8.
  • 59. Starnes HM, Rock KD, Jackson TW, et al. A critical review and meta-analysis of impacts of per- and polyfluorinated substances on the brain and behavior. Front Toxicol 2022;4:881584.
  • 60. Grgas D, Petrina A, Stefanac T, et al. A review: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances-biological degradation. Toxics 2023;11:446.
  • 61. Kurwadkar S, Dane J, Kanel SR, et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water and wastewater: a critical review of their global occurrence and distribution. Sci Total Environ 2022;809:151003.
  • 62. Lin Z, Ersan MS, Garcia-Segura S, et al. Electrocatalytic water treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances reduces adsorbable organofluorine and bioaccumulation potential. RSC Adv 2024;14:15627−36.
  • 63. Ames JL, Sharma V, Lyall K. Effects of early-life PFAS exposure on child neurodevelopment: a review of the evidence and research gaps. Curr Environ Health Rep 2025;12:9.
  • 64. Bline AP, DeWitt JC, Kwiatkowski CF, et al. Public health risks of PFAS-related immunotoxicity are real. Curr Environ Health Rep 2024;11:118−27.
  • 65. Fenton SE, Ducatman A, Boobis A, et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance toxicity and human health review: current state of knowledge and strategies for informing future research. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:606−30.
  • 66. India-Aldana S, Yao M, Midya V, et al. PFAS exposures and the human metabolome: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Curr Pollut Rep 2023;9:510−68.
  • 67. Sadrabadi F, Alarcan J, Sprenger H, et al. Impact of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and PFAS mixtures on lipid metabolism in differentiated HepaRG cells as a model for human hepatocytes. Arch Toxicol 2024;98:507−24.
  • 68. Johnson GR, Brusseau ML, Carroll KC, et al. Global distributions, source-type dependencies, and concentration ranges of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in groundwater. Sci Total Environ 2022;841:156602.
  • 69. McMahon PB, Tokranov AK, Bexfield LM, et al. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in groundwater used as a source of drinking water in the Eastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 2022;56:2279−88.
  • 70. Khan B, Burgess RM, Cantwell MG. Occurrence and bioaccumulation patterns of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the marine environment. ACS ES T Water 2023;3:1243−59.
  • 71. Pickard HM, Ruyle BJ, Haque F, et al. Characterizing the areal extent of PFAS contamination in fish species downgradient of AFFF source zones. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:19440−53.
  • 72. Dimitrakopoulou ME, Karvounis M, Marinos G, et al. Comprehensive analysis of PFAS presence from environment to plate. NPJ Sci Food 2024;8:80.
  • 73. Lyu X, Xiao F, Shen C, et al. Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in subsurface environments: occurrence, fate, transport, and research prospect. Rev Geophys 2022;60:e2021RG000765.
  • 74. Patel M, Kumar R, Kishor K, et al. Pharmaceuticals of emerging concern in aquatic systems: chemistry, occurrence, effects, and removal methods. Chem Rev 2019;119:3510−673.
  • 75. Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, et al. Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. Int Soil Conserv Res 2015;3:57−65.
  • 76. Lin Y, Zhao Y, Liu Y, et al. Occurrence and bioaccumulation of parabens and their metabolites in the biota from a subtropical freshwater river ecosystem: implications for human exposure. Environ Res 2023;240:117530.
  • 77. Narayanan M, Kandasamy S, Lee J, et al. Microbial degradation and transformation of PPCPs in aquatic environment: a review. Heliyon 2023;9:e18426.
  • 78. Kidd KA, Backhaus T, Brodin T, et al. Environmental risks of pharmaceutical mixtures in aquatic ecosystems: reflections on a decade of research. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:549−58.
  • 79. Wilkinson JL, Boxall AB, Kolpin DW, et al. Pharmaceutical pollution of the world's rivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119:e2113947119.
  • 80. Ashraf M, Ahammad SZ, Chakma S. Advancements in the dominion of fate and transport of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: a bibliometric study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023;30:64313−41.
  • 81. Yan S, Yao B, Lian L, et al. Development of fluorescence surrogates to predict the photochemical transformation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluents. Environ Sci Technol 2017;51:2738−47.
  • 82. Kawabata K, Sugihara K, Sanoh S, et al. Photodegradation of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment by sunlight and UV-A, -B and -C irradiation. J Toxicol Sci 2013;38:215−23.
  • 83. Boreen AL, Arnold WA, McNeill K. Photodegradation of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a review. Aquat Sci Res Boundaries 2003;65:320−41.
  • 84. Manaia CM, Aga DS, Cytryn E, et al. The complex interplay between antibiotic resistance and pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:637−52.
  • 85. Caioni G, Benedetti E, Perugini M, et al. Personal care products as a contributing factor to antimicrobial resistance: current state and novel approach to investigation. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023;12:724.
  • 86. Anand U, Adelodun B, Cabreros C, et al. Occurrence, transformation, bioaccumulation, risk and analysis of pharmaceutical and personal care products from wastewater: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2022;20:3883−904.
  • 87. Kenyon C. Concentrations of ciprofloxacin in the world’s rivers are associated with the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli: a global ecological analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11:417.
  • 88. Corbin G, Vulliet E, Lanson B, et al. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals onto smectite clay minerals: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Minerals 2021;11:62.
  • 89. Jin R, Zhao C, Song Y, et al. Competitive adsorption of sulfamethoxazole and bisphenol A on magnetic biochar: mechanism and site energy distribution. Environ Pollut 2023;329:121662.
  • 90. Chokejaroenrat C, Sakulthaew C, Satchasataporn K, et al. Enrofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole sorption on carbonized leonardite: kinetics, isotherms, influential effects, and antibacterial activity toward S. aureus ATCC 25923. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11:1261.
  • 91. Li L, Zhang C. Role of natural and modified clay minerals in microbial hydrocarbon biodegradation. Minerals 2025;15:1120.
  • 92. Conde-Cid M, Nunez-Delgado A, Fernandez-Sanjurjo M, et al. Tetracycline and sulfonamide antibiotics in soils: presence, fate and environmental risks. Processes 2020;8:1479.
  • 93. D’Aniello A, Pirone D, Cimorelli L, et al. A comparative analysis of different physically based modeling approaches to predict the fate of sewer leaks and their effects on urban aquifer recharge and contamination. J Hydrol (Amst) 2026;667:134948.
  • 94. S DL, B VG, Murali V. From prescription to pollution: the ecological consequences of NSAIDs in aquatic ecosystems. Toxicol Rep 2024;13:101775.
  • 95. Hernandez-Zamora M, Cruz-Castillo LM, Martinez-Jeronimo L, et al. Diclofenac produces diverse toxic effects on aquatic organisms of different trophic levels, including microalgae, cladocerans, and fish. Water (Basel) 2025;17:1489.
  • 96. Huynh NC, Nguyen TT, Nguyen DT, et al. Occurrence, toxicity, impact and removal of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): a review. Sci Total Environ 2023;898:165317.
  • 97. Bayen S, Segovia Estrada E, Zhang H, et al. Partitioning and bioaccumulation of legacy and emerging hydrophobic organic chemicals in mangrove ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:2549−58.
  • 98. Fairbairn DJ, Karpuzcu ME, Arnold WA, et al. Sediment-water distribution of contaminants of emerging concern in a mixed use watershed. Sci Total Environ 2015;505:896−904.
  • 99. Thomas T, Fat M, Kearns G. Sunscreens: potential hazards to environmental and human health. Front Mar Sci 2024;11:1471574.
  • 100. Liu S, Wang P, Wang C, et al. Disparate toxicity mechanisms of parabens with different alkyl chain length in freshwater biofilms: ecological hazards associated with antibiotic resistome. Sci Total Environ 2023;881:163168.
  • 101. Meador JP, Yeh A, Young G, et al. Contaminants of emerging concern in a large temperate estuary. Environ Pollut 2016;213:254−67.
  • 102. Gomez-Regalado MD, Martín J, Santos JL, et al. Bioaccumulation/bioconcentration of pharmaceutical active compounds in aquatic organisms: assessment and factors database. Sci Total Environ 2023;861:160638.
  • 103. Jeon DR, Kim YE, Im JK, et al. Non-targeted screening and identification of the transformation pathway of carbamazepine in the Saemangeum watershed, Republic of Korea. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:11947.
  • 104. Nolte TM. 300-fold higher neuro- and immunotoxicity from low-redox transformation of carbamazepine. Toxicol Rep 2023;11:319−29.
  • 105. Al Shuraiqi A, Al-Habsi A, Barry MJ. Time-, dose- and transgenerational effects of fluoxetine on the behavioural responses of zebrafish to a conspecific alarm substance. Environ Pollut 2021;270:116164.
  • 106. Li S, Liu Y, Wu Y, et al. Antibiotics in global rivers. NSO 2022;1:20220029.
  • 107. Ramadan L, Ozturk-Ufuk I, Yuksel E, et al. Development of LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of emerging contaminants in aquatic matrices. Water Air Soil Pollut 2024;235:537.
  • 108. Yao W, Ge J, Hu Q, et al. An advanced LC-MS/MS protocol for simultaneous detection of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2023;37:e9397.
  • 109. Roslan NS, Lee YY, Ibrahim YS, et al. Detection of microplastics in human tissues and organs: a scoping review. J Glob Health 2024;14:04179.
  • 110. Maitz MF, Lenz R, Winkler S, et al. Weathered microplastics in human blood: unraveling the effect of structural changes at the particle surface on coagulation and platelet activation. Micropl &Nanopl 2025;5:33.
  • 111. Brits M, van Velzen MJ, Sefiloglu FO, et al. Quantitation of micro and nanoplastics in human blood by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Micropl Nanopl 2024;4:12.
  • 112. Leslie HA, van Velzen MJ, Brandsma SH, et al. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int 2022;163:107199.
  • 113. Garcia MA, Liu R, Nihart A, et al. Quantitation and identification of microplastics accumulation in human placental specimens using pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Toxicol Sci 2024;199:81−8.
  • 114. Ghosh S, Sinha JK, Ghosh S, et al. Microplastics as an emerging threat to the global environment and human health. Sustainability 2023;15:10821.
  • 115. Osman AI, Hosny M, Eltaweil AS, et al. Microplastic sources, formation, toxicity and remediation: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2023;21:2129−69.
  • 116. Kerpen NB, Schlurmann T, Schendel A, et al. Wave-induced distribution of microplastic in the surf zone. Front Mar Sci 2020;7:590565.
  • 117. Horta MJ, Krishna YS, Seetha N, et al. Modeling the fate and transport of microplastics in various aquatic environmental compartments. In: Surampalli RY, Zhang TC, Al-Hashimi BM, , editorset al.: Microplastics in the environment. Wiley; 2025. p. 207−57.
  • 118. Mohsin MA, Abd Zaid AH. Microplastic pollution in the environment: a chemical engineering perspective on sources, fate, and mitigation strategies. Polymers (Basel) 2025;18:29.
  • 119. Haque F, Fan C. Fate and impacts of microplastics in the environment: hydrosphere, pedosphere, and atmosphere. Environments 2023;10:70.
  • 120. Li W, Zu B, Yang Q, et al. Sources, distribution, and environmental effects of microplastics: a systematic review. RSC Adv 2023;13:15566−74.
  • 121. Monira S, Roychand R, Bhuiyan MA, et al. Role of water shear force for microplastics fragmentation into nanoplastics. Environ Res 2023;237:116916.
  • 122. Meides N, Mauel A, Menzel T, et al. Quantifying the fragmentation of polypropylene upon exposure to accelerated weathering. Micropl &Nanopl 2022;2:23.
  • 123. Kamalasekaran K, Sundramoorthy AK. A review on microplastics: sources, environmental fate, degradation pathways, and analytical identification methods. RSC Adv 2026;16:13851−74.
  • 124. Kvale K, Prowe AE, Chien CT, et al. The global biological microplastic particle sink. Sci Rep 2020;10:16670.
  • 125. Barrett J, Chase Z, Zhang J, et al. Microplastic pollution in deep-sea sediments from the great Australian bight. Front Mar Sci 2020;7:576170.
  • 126. Singer MN, Mohsen B, Katzourakis VE, et al. Mechanisms governing the transport of nanoparticles and microplastics in porous media: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 2025;13:118002.
  • 127. Huang D, Chen H, Shen M, et al. Recent advances on the transport of microplastics/nanoplastics in abiotic and biotic compartments. J Hazard Mater 2022;438:129515.
  • 128. Xu D, Zhang G, Zhu C, et al. Transport of nanoplastics in saturated porous media: synergy of particle size, surface functional groups, and low molecular weight organic acids. J Hazard Mater 2026;503:141212.
  • 129. Krishna YS, Seetha N, Hassanizadeh SM. Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of temporal variation in ionic strength on colloid retention and remobilization in saturated porous media. J Contam Hydrol 2022;251:104079.
  • 130. Kim C, Pennell KD, Fortner JD. Delineating the relationship between nanoparticle attachment efficiency and fluid flow velocity. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:13992−9.
  • 131. Trevisan R, Ranasinghe P, Jayasundara N, et al. Nanoplastics in aquatic environments: impacts on aquatic species and interactions with environmental factors and pollutants. Toxics 2022;10:326.
  • 132. Chen Q, Zhao H, Liu Y, et al. Factors affecting the adsorption of heavy metals by microplastics and their toxic effects on fish. Toxics 2023;11:490.
  • 133. Rafa N, Ahmed B, Zohora F, et al. Microplastics as carriers of toxic pollutants: source, transport, and toxicological effects. Environ Pollut 2024;343:123190.
  • 134. Wang J, Cong J, Wu J, et al. Nanoplastic-protein corona interactions and their biological effects: a review of recent advances and trends. TrAC Anal Chem 2023;166:117206.
  • 135. Cao F, Liu B, Hou X, et al. Maternal polystyrene nanoplastics suppress zebrafish offspring development and locomotion through mitochondrial dysfunction. Environ Pollut 2025;385:127070.
  • 136. Sendra M, Saco A, Yeste MP, et al. Nanoplastics: from tissue accumulation to cell translocation into Mytilus galloprovincialis hemocytes. resilience of immune cells exposed to nanoplastics and nanoplastics plus Vibrio splendidus combination. J Hazard Mater 2020;388:121788.
  • 137. Pitt JA, Trevisan R, Massarsky A, et al. Maternal transfer of nanoplastics to offspring in zebrafish (Danio rerio): a case study with nanopolystyrene. Sci Total Environ 2018;643:324−34.
  • 138. Kangas A, Setala O, Kauppi L, et al. Trophic transfer increases the exposure to microplastics in littoral predators. Mar Pollut Bull 2023;196:115553.
  • 139. Gunaalan K, Nielsen TG, Rodriguez Torres R, et al. Is zooplankton an entry point of microplastics into the marine food web? Environ Sci Technol 2023;57:11643−55.
  • 140. Du J, Qiu L, Zhou Q, et al. Microplastics as vectors for environmental contaminants in the food chain: assessing the combined toxicological effects and bioavailability. Toxicol Lett 2025;413:111734.
  • 141. Liu G, Dave PH, Kwong RW, et al. Influence of microplastics on the mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity of heavy metals: a review. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2021;107:710−21.
  • 142. Ojo AB, Agbeye OD, Ogwa TO, et al. Implications of plastic-derived endocrine disruptors on human health. Toxicol Mech Methods 2025;35:894−918.
  • 143. Cortes-Ramirez SA, Ho SM, Leung YK. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a looming threat to current and future generations. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:8222.
  • 144. Srebny V, Henneberger L, Konig M, et al. Beyond estrogenicity: a comparative assessment of bisphenol a and its alternatives in in vitro assays questions safety of replacements. Environ Sci Technol 2025;59:17457−70.
  • 145. Gong W, Wei XY. The toxicity of bisphenol A and its analogues on human. Highl Sci Eng Technol 2023;40:265−70.
  • 146. Hilz EN, Gore AC. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: science and policy. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 2023;10:142−50.
  • 147. Pan J, Liu P, Yu X, et al. The adverse role of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the reproductive system. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024;14:1324993.
  • 148. Lucas A, Herrmann S, Lucas M. The role of endocrine-disrupting phthalates and bisphenols in cardiometabolic disease: the evidence is mounting. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2022;29:87−94.
  • 149. Chen Y, Hozalski RM, Olmanson LG, et al. Prediction of photochemically produced reactive intermediates in surface waters via satellite remote sensing. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:6671−81.
  • 150. Sunday MO, Takeda K, Sakugawa H. Singlet oxygen photogeneration in coastal seawater: prospect of large-scale modeling in seawater surface and its environmental significance. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:6125−33.
  • 151. Wang K, Larkin T, Singhal N, et al. Leachability of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in municipal sewage sludge: effects of EDCs interaction with dissolved organic matter. Sci Total Environ 2020;742:140366.
  • 152. Cooper R, David A, Lange A, et al. Health effects and life stage sensitivities in zebrafish exposed to an estrogenic wastewater treatment works effluent. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:666656.
  • 153. Hamilton PB, Lockyer AE, Uren Webster TM, et al. Investigation into adaptation in genes associated with response to estrogenic pollution in populations of roach (Rutilus rutilus) living in English rivers. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:15935−45.
  • 154. Vilela CLS, Peixoto RS, Rachid CT, et al. Assessing the impact of synthetic estrogen on the microbiome of aerated submerged fixed-film reactors simulating tertiary sewage treatment and isolation of estrogen-degrading consortium. Sci Total Environ 2020;743:140428.
  • 155. Hardegen J, Braeutigam P, Abendroth C, et al. Bisphenol A: quantification in complex matrices and removal by anaerobic sludges. Pollutants 2021;1:194−206.
  • 156. Frankowski R, Zgola-Grzeskowiak A, Smulek W, et al. Removal of bisphenol A and its potential substitutes by biodegradation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2020;191:1100−10.
  • 157. Rehberger K, Wernicke von Siebenthal E, Bailey C, et al. Long-term exposure to low 17a-ethinylestradiol (EE2) concentrations disrupts both the reproductive and the immune system of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environ Int 2020;142:105836.
  • 158. Bottalico LN, Weljie AM. Cross-species physiological interactions of endocrine disrupting chemicals with the circadian clock. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2021;301:113650.
  • 159. Yan D, Jiao Y, Yan H, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health 2022;21:53.
  • 160. Celik MN, Yesildemir O. Endocrine disruptors in child obesity and related disorders: early critical windows of exposure. Curr Nutr Rep 2025;14:14.
  • 161. Baynes A, Lange A, Beresford N, et al. Endocrine disruption is reduced but still widespread in wild roach (Rutilus rutilus) living in English rivers. Environ Sci Technol 2023;57:12632−41.
  • 162. Kamel A, Matten SR, Lynn SG, et al. Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay: investigation of the potential effects of five chemicals on the hypothalamic-pituitary thyroid axis of Xenopus laevis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2022;134:105241.
  • 163. Liang Y, Lu Q, Chen M, et al. Impact of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on epigenetic regulation in the uterus: a narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2025;23:80.
  • 164. Lv Y, Jia Z, Wang Y, et al. Prenatal EDC exposure, DNA Methylation, and early childhood growth: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ Int 2024;190:108872.
  • 165. McSwiggin H, Magalhaes R, Nilsson EE, et al. Epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of toxicant exposure-specific non-coding RNA in sperm. Environ Epigenet 2024;10:dvae014.
  • 166. Andonotopo W, Bachnas MA, Dewantiningrum J, et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: translating mechanisms into perinatal risk assessment. J Perinat Med 2025;53:1238−52.
  • 167. Tzouma Z, Dourou P, Diamanti A, et al. Associations between endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure and fertility outcomes: a decade of human epidemiological evidence. Life (Basel) 2025;15:993.
  • 168. Kahn LG, Philippat C, Nakayama SF, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: implications for human health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8:703−18.
  • 169. Mohanty B. Pesticides exposure and compromised fitness in wild birds: focusing on the reproductive endocrine disruption. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2024;199:105800.
  • 170. Chavez-Hernandez JA, Velarde-Salcedo AJ, Navarro-Tovar G, et al. Safe nanomaterials: from their use, application, and disposal to regulations. Nanoscale Adv 2024;6:1583−610.
  • 171. Hendricks N, Olatunji O, Ofori I, et al. Occurrence, fate, and impact of engineered metal/carbonaceous nanomaterials in the environment, detection, and quantitation methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2023;20:12937−54.
  • 172. Fiordaliso F, Bigini P, Salmona M, et al. Toxicological impact of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and food-grade titanium dioxide (E171) on human and environmental health. Environ Sci Nano 2022;9:1199−211.
  • 173. Dube E, Okuthe GE. Silver nanoparticle-based antimicrobial coatings: sustainable strategies for microbial contamination control. Microbiol Res (Pavia) 2025;16:110.
  • 174. Fernando I, Lu D, Zhou Y. Interactive influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and electrolytes on the colloidal stability of silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Nano 2020;7:186−97.
  • 175. Patino JE, Kuhl TL, Morales VL. Direct measurements of the forces between silver and mica in humic substance-rich solutions. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:15076−85.
  • 176. Liu Y, Li C, Luo S, et al. Inter-transformation between silver nanoparticles and Ag+ induced by humic acid under light or dark conditions. Ecotoxicology 2021;30:1376−85.
  • 177. Zhang Y, Xu J, Yang Y, et al. Impacts of proteins on dissolution and sulfidation of silver nanowires in an aquatic environment: importance of surface charges. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54:5560−8.
  • 178. Zhang L, Cui Y, Xu J, et al. Ecotoxicity and trophic transfer of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 2024;924:171660.
  • 179. Zhao X, Liang J, Li Y, et al. Trophic transfer of metal nanoparticles in an aquatic food chain diminishes their toxicity disparities. Environ Sci Technol 2025;59:6812−24.
  • 180. Vineeth Kumar CM, Karthick V, Kumar VG, et al. The impact of engineered nanomaterials on the environment: release mechanism, toxicity, transformation, and remediation. Environ Res 2022;212:113202.
  • 181. Corsi I, Bellingeri A, Eliso MC, et al. Eco-interactions of engineered nanomaterials in the marine environment: towards an eco-design framework. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2021;11:1903.
  • 182. Harrison DM, Briffa SM, Mazzonello A, et al. A review of the aquatic environmental transformations of engineered nanomaterials. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2023;13:2098.
  • 183. Mahjoubian M, Sadat Naeemi A, Sheykhan M. Comparative toxicity of TiO2 and Sn-doped TiO2 nanoparticles in zebrafish after acute and chronic exposure. Biol Trace Elem Res 2024;202:1−19.
  • 184. Yan X, Pan Z, Chen S, et al. Rice exposure to silver nanoparticles in a life cycle study: effect of dose responses on grain metabolomic profile, yield, and soil bacteria. Environ Sci Nano 2022;9:2195−206.
  • 185. You Y, Kerner P, Shanmugam S, et al. Emerging investigator series: differential effects of carbon nanotubes and graphene on the tomato rhizosphere microbiome. Environ Sci Nano 2023;10:1570−84.
  • 186. Khan ST, Adil SF, Shaik MR, et al. Engineered nanomaterials in soil: their impact on soil microbiome and plant health. Plants (Basel) 2021;11:109.
  • 187. Nishmitha PS, Akhilghosh KA, Aiswriya VP, et al. Understanding emerging contaminants in water and wastewater: a comprehensive review on detection, impacts, and solutions. J Hazard Mater Adv 2025;18:100755.
  • 188. Baqar M, Chen H, Yao Y, Sun H. Latest trends in the environmental analysis of PFAS including nontarget analysis and EOF-, AOF-, and TOP-based methodologies. Anal Bioanal Chem 2025;417:555−71.
  • 189. Alygizakis N, Lestremau F, Gago-Ferrero P, et al. Towards a harmonized identification scoring system in LC-HRMS/MS based non-target screening (NTS) of emerging contaminants. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2023;159:116944.
  • 190. Mundhenke TF, Bhat AP, Pomerantz WC, et al. Photolysis products of fluorinated pharmaceuticals: a combined fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry approach. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:2285−96.
  • 191. Zhang K, Qadeer A, Chang S, et al. Short-chain PFASs dominance and their environmental transport dynamics in urban water systems: insights from multimedia transport analysis and human exposure risk. Environ Int 2025;202:109602.
  • 192. Jurado A, Labad F, Scheiber L, et al. Occurrence of pharmaceuticals and risk assessment in urban groundwater. Adv Geosci 2022;59:1−7.
  • 193. Hartz WF, Bjornsdotter MK, Yeung LW, et al. Sources and seasonal variations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in surface snow in the arctic. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:21817−28.
  • 194. Mi L, Xie Z, Xu W, et al. Air-sea exchange and atmospheric deposition of phthalate esters in the south china sea. Environ Sci Technol 2023;57:11195−205.
  • 195. Qiao W, Yuan X, Dong L, et al. Adsorption behaviour of tetrabromobisphenol A on sediments in Weihe River Basin in Northwest China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023;30:6604−11.
  • 196. Tasselli S, Rogora M, Orru A, et al. Behaviour of synthetic musk fragrances in freshwaters: occurrence, relations with environmental parameters, and preliminary risk assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023;30:109643−58.
  • 197. Grancic P, Bohm L, Gerzabek MH, et al. On the nature of hydrophobic organic compound adsorption to smectite minerals using the example of hexachlorobenzene-montmorillonite interactions. Minerals 2023;13:280.
  • 198. Asamoah BO, Uurasjarvi E, Raty J, et al. Towards the development of portable and in situ optical devices for detection of micro and nanoplastics in water: a review on the current status. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:730.
  • 199. Cousins IT, DeWitt JC, Gluge J, et al. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environ Sci Process Impacts 2020;22:2307−12.
  • 200. Levakov I, Shahar Y, Rytwo G. Carbamazepine removal by clay-based materials using adsorption and photodegradation. Water (Basel) 2022;14:2047.
  • 201. Xie J, Li H, Wang S, et al. Removal and fate of carbamazepine in the microbial fuel cell coupled constructed wetland system. Environ Eng Res 2021;27:210119.
  • 202. Fernandes JP, Almeida CM, Salgado MA, et al. Pharmaceutical compounds in aquatic environments-occurrence, fate and bioremediation prospective. Toxics 2021;9:257.
  • 203. da Luz VC, Bazoti SF, Behling L, et al. Enhanced UV direct photolysis and UV/H2O2 for oxidation of triclosan and ibuprofen in synthetic effluent: an experimental study. Water Air Soil Pollut 2022;233:126.
  • 204. Kansara K, Bolan S, Radhakrishnan D, et al. A critical review on the role of abiotic factors on the transformation, environmental identity and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 2022;296:118726.
  • 205. Jesus F, Domingues E, Bernardo C, et al. Ozonation of selected pharmaceutical and personal care products in secondary effluent-degradation kinetics and environmental assessment. Toxics 2022;10:765.
  • 206. Goh JW, Xiong Y, Wu W, et al. Degradation of carbamazepine by HF-free-synthesized MIL-101(Cr)@Anatase TiO2 Composite under UV-a irradiation: degradation mechanism, wastewater matrix effect, and degradation pathway. Water (Basel) 2022;14:3964.
  • 207. Bhangare D, Rajput N, Jadav T, et al. Systematic strategies for degradation kinetic study of pharmaceuticals: an issue of utmost importance concerning current stability analysis practices. J Anal Sci Technol 2022;13:7.
  • 208. Xue J, Kannan K. Accumulation profiles of parabens and their metabolites in fish, black bear, and birds, including bald eagles and albatrosses. Environ Int 2016;94:546−53.
  • 209. Li X, Bao L, Wei Y, et al. Occurrence, bioaccumulation, and risk assessment of microplastics in the aquatic environment: a review. Water (Basel) 2023;15:1768.
  • 210. Teunen L, Bervoets L, Belpaire C, et al. PFAS accumulation in indigenous and translocated aquatic organisms from Belgium, with translation to human and ecological health risk. Environ Sci Eur 2021;33:39.
  • 211. Dalu T, Themba ST, Dondofema F, et al. Assessing microplastic abundances in freshwater fishes in a subtropical African reservoir. Discov Sustain 2024;5:360.
  • 212. Mqambalala A, Maleke M, Osman JR, et al. Biodegradation of emerging contaminants controlled by biological and chemical factors. Microorganisms 2025;13:2354.
  • 213. Kumar V, S H, Huligowda LK, et al. Environmental pollutants as emerging concerns for cardiac diseases: a review on their impacts on cardiac health. Biomedicines 2025;13:241.
  • 214. Klibaner-Schiff E, Simonin EM, Akdis CA, et al. Environmental exposures influence multigenerational epigenetic transmission. Clin Epigenetics 2024;16:145.
  • 215. Abdulkadir A, Kandel S, Lewis N, et al. Epigenetic consequences of in utero PFAS exposure: implications for development and long-term health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2025;22:917.
  • 216. Reddy SR, Bangeppagari M, Lee SJ. Immune-epigenetic effects of environmental pollutants: mechanisms, biomarkers, and transgenerational impact. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2025;47:703.
  • 217. Ehrlich V, Bil W, Vandebriel R, et al. Consideration of pathways for immunotoxicity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environ Health 2023;22:19.
  • 218. Płuciennik K, Sicinska P, Misztal W, et al. Important factors affecting induction of cell death, oxidative stress and DNA damage by nano- and microplastic particles in vitro. Cells 2024;13:768.
  • 219. Hou J, Zhao L, Tang H, et al. Silver nanoparticles induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial injuries mediated autophagy in HC11 cells through Akt/AMPK/mTOR pathway. Biol Trace Elem Res 2021;199:1062−73.
  • 220. Muzammil S, Ashraf A, Siddique MH, et al. A review on toxicity of nanomaterials in agriculture: current scenario and future prospects. Sci Prog 2023;106:368504231221672.
  • 221. Abegunde SM, Alaka MO, Awonyemi OI. Nanomaterial toxicity: a comprehensive review of mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Discov Hazards 2025;1:3.
  • 222. Bhuyan MS. Effects of microplastics on fish and in human health. Front Environ Sci 2022;10:827289.
  • 223. Witczak A, Przedpelska L, Pokorska-Niewiada K, et al. Microplastics as a threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Toxics 2024;12:571.
  • 224. Ali SS, Alsharbaty MH, Al-Tohamy R, et al. Microplastics as persistent and vectors of other threats in the marine environment: toxicological impacts, management and strategical roadmap to end plastic pollution. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 2025;7:229−51.
  • 225. Xiao X, Li J, Rao W, et al. Effect of microplastics on the bioavailability of (semi-)metals in the soil earthworm Eisenia fetida. Agronomy 2025;15:1052.
  • 226. Chen XJ, Ma JJ, Yu RL, et al. Bioaccessibility of microplastic-associated heavy metals using an in vitro digestion model and its implications for human health risk assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022;29:76983−91.
  • 227. Wang J, Tsogbadrakh O, Tian J, et al. Distribution and ecological risk assessment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Chinese soils: a review. Water (Basel) 2025;17:2246.
  • 228. Forster AL, Zhang Y, Westerman DC, et al. Corrigendum to “Improved total organic fluorine methods for more comprehensive measurement of PFAS in industrial wastewater, river water, and air” [Water Research 235 (2023) 119859]. Water Res 2024;256:121369.
  • 229. Zahn D, Arp HP, Fenner K, et al. Should transformation products change the way we manage chemicals? Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:7710−8.
  • 230. Pasquini L, Lardy-Fontan S, Rosin C. Pesticide transformation products: a potential new source of interest for drinking water. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2025;32:4619−35.
  • 231. Manuguerra S, Carli F, Scoditti E, et al. Effects of mixtures of emerging pollutants and drugs on modulation of biomarkers related to toxicity, oxidative stress, and cancer. Metabolites 2024;14:559.
  • 232. Ortuzar M, Esterhuizen M, Olicon-Hernandez DR, et al. Pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic environments: a concise review of environmental impacts and bioremediation systems. Front Microbiol 2022;13:869332.
  • 233. Gasparini C. Erosion of behavioural plasticity and pace-of-life shifts under multigenerational pharmaceutical pollution. J Anim Ecol 2025;94:179−81.
  • 234. Aich U, Polverino G, Yazdan Parast F, et al. Long-term effects of widespread pharmaceutical pollution on trade-offs between behavioural, life-history and reproductive traits in fish. J Anim Ecol 2025;94:340−55.
  • 235. Vinogradov I, Aich U, Manera J, et al. Sex-specific effect of long-term fluoxetine exposure on inhibitory control in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2025;79:55.
  • 236. Sanchez-Cid C, Ghaly TM, Gillings MR, et al. Sub-inhibitory gentamicin pollution induces gentamicin resistance gene integration in class 1 integrons in the environment. Sci Rep 2023;13:8612.
  • 237. Shafiq M, Obinwanne Okoye C, Nazar M, et al. Ecological consequences of antimicrobial residues and bioactive chemicals on antimicrobial resistance in agroecosystems. J Adv Res 2025;74:99−120.
  • 238. Lu J, Sha H, Chen J, et al. Characterizing sediment functional traits and ecological consequences respond to increasing antibiotic pollution. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2023;107:4093−107.
  • 239. Huang X, Auffan M, Eckelman MJ, et al. Trends, risks and opportunities in environmental nanotechnology. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2024;5:572−87.
  • 240. Bhardwaj G, Abdulkadhim M, Joshi K, et al. Exposure pathways, systemic distribution, and health implications of micro- and nanoplastics in humans. Appl Sci 2025;15:8813.
  • 241. Thapliyal C, Negi S, Nagarkoti S, et al. Mechanistic insight into potential toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on human health. Discov Appl Sci 2025;7:645.
  • 242. Lane T, Wardani I, Koelmans AA. Exposure scenarios for human health risk assessment of nano- and microplastic particles. Microplast nanoplast 2025;5:28.
  • 243. Liu X, Xie W, Lv S, et al. Long-term effects of PM2.5 and its components on incident hypertension among the middle-aged and elderly: a national cohort study. BMC Public Health 2025;25:960.
  • 244. Lee DW, Jung J, Park SA, et al. Microplastic particles in human blood and their association with coagulation markers. Sci Rep 2024;14:30419.
  • 245. Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, et al. Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ Int 2021;146:106274.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Systematic review of emerging environmental contaminants: sources, environmental fate, and impacts
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Systematic review of emerging environmental contaminants: sources, environmental fate, and impacts
Close

Figure